Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChaboyer, Wendyen_US
dc.contributor.authorNajman, Jakeen_US
dc.contributor.authorDunn, Sandraen_US
dc.contributor.editorJane J.A. Robinsonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T10:39:52Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T10:39:52Z
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.date.modified2007-03-14T02:27:30Z
dc.identifier.issn03092402en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01886.xen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/3952
dc.description.abstractAim. This study examines the extent to which hospital nurses view their working environment in a positive sense, working as a cohesive group. Background. Despite the fact that nursing in Australia is now considered a profession, it has been claimed that nurses are an oppressed group who use horizontal violence, bullying and aggression in their interactions with one and other. Methods. After ethical approval, a random sample of 666 nurses working directly with patients and all 333 critical care nurses employed in three large tertiary Australian hospitals were invited to participate in the study in the late 1990s. A mailed survey examined the perceptions of interaction nurses had with each other. The hypothesis, that level of employment (either Level I bedside nurses or Level II/III clinical leaders) and area of work (either critical care or noncritical care) would influence perceptions of cohesion, as measured by the cohesion amongst nurses scale (CANS) was tested. Results. In total 555 (56%) surveys were returned. Of these, 413 were returned by Level I and 142 by Level II/III nurses. Of this sample, 189 were critical care and 355 noncritical care nurses. There was no difference between Level I and II/III nurses in mean CANS scores. It is interesting to note that the item rated most positively was 'nurses on the units worked well together', however, the item rated least positive was 'staff can be really bitchy towards each other' for both Level I and II/III nurses. There was no difference in CANS scores between critical care and noncritical care nurses. Conclusions. Nurses working in Australian hospitals perceived themselves to be moderately cohesive but, as would be expected in other work settings, some negative perceptions existed.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherBlackwell Scienceen_US
dc.publisher.placeUKen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01886.xen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom526en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto532en_US
dc.relation.ispartofeditionAugust 2001en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue4en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Advanced Nursingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume35en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode321103en_US
dc.titleCohesion among nurses: a comparison of bedside vs. charge nurses' perceptions in Australian hospitalsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Health, School of Nursing and Midwiferyen_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright 2001 Blackwell Publishing. The definitive version is available at [www.blackwell-synergy.com.]en_AU
gro.date.issued2001
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record