Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWyder, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorRoennfeldt, Helena
dc.contributor.authorKisely, Steven
dc.contributor.authorEhrlich, Carolyn
dc.contributor.authorLau, Geoffrey
dc.contributor.authorVilic, Gabrielle
dc.contributor.authorCrompton, David
dc.contributor.authorDark, Frances
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-10T05:28:33Z
dc.date.available2020-07-10T05:28:33Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1838-7357
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/18387357.2020.1717360
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/395339
dc.description.abstractBackground: While there have been increased calls for mental health consumers to be involved in mental health services research, there is limited research exploring the research interests of this group. Aims: To compare the interests in different research topics of a peer workforce (people who are employed to use their lived experience of mental illness and recovery to support others) with those of Allied Health Professionals in a Hospital and Health Service. Method: A survey asking participants to rate their interest in researching various topics was distributed to the peer and allied health workforce. Differences between the two groups were tested with the Kruskal–Wallis test for independent samples. Results: The peer workforce consistently rated their interest in all questions as greater than the Allied Health Workforce with five of the seven questions showing statistically significant differences. The median ratings of interest for four of the seven topics were high for both the peer and allied health. These were primarily items on how to help. The peer workforce also expressed a greater interest in being involved in the research. Conclusions: Our study emphasises the importance of creating opportunities for including the peer workforce in all aspects of the research process.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherRoutledge: Taylor & Francis Group
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAdvances in Mental Health
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPublic Health and Health Services
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPsychology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1103
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1117
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1701
dc.subject.keywordsScience & Technology
dc.subject.keywordsLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject.keywordsPsychiatry
dc.subject.keywordsPeer workforce
dc.subject.keywordsallied health workforce
dc.titleThe questions we ask - differences between the peer and allied health workforces
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWyder, M; Roennfeldt, H; Kisely, S; Ehrlich, C; Lau, G; Vilic, G; Crompton, D; Dark, F, The questions we ask - differences between the peer and allied health workforces, Advances in Mental Health, 2020
dc.date.updated2020-07-10T05:27:08Z
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered in Griffith Research Online as an advanced online version.
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorCrompton, David R.
gro.griffith.authorEhrlich, Carolyn E.
gro.griffith.authorWyder, Marianne
gro.griffith.authorRoennfeldt, Helena L.
gro.griffith.authorKisely, Steve R.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record