Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKelley, J
dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, GT
dc.contributor.authorSmith, TM
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-16T00:37:21Z
dc.date.available2020-07-16T00:37:21Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0047-2484
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102823
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/395465
dc.description.abstractAge at lower first molar (M1) emergence is a commonly used proxy for inferring life-history scheduling in fossil primates, but its utility is dependent on knowing to what extent extant populations vary in this datum and how this variation correlates with the scheduling of life-history variables. Here, we address the first of these issues among extant chimpanzees. While age at M1 emergence has been documented in several live individuals from the Kanyawara population of Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii in Uganda, it has been estimated for only one individual of Pan troglodytes verus, based on a deceased animal from the Taï Forest in Côte d'Ivoire. To further explore interpopulation variation in this variable in chimpanzees, and using dental histology, we calculated ages at death for two wild-shot individuals of P. t. verus with erupting M1, both collected in Liberia during the mid-1950s, and estimated ages at M1 emergence from the ages at death. The overall range for these two individuals is ∼4.2–4.6 yr, compared with an age of ∼3.7 yr for the individual from the Taï Forest, and <2.5–3.3 yr for the several individuals of P. t. schweinfurthii. While the absolute range of ∼2 yr in these samples combined is little greater than in captive chimpanzees, the disparity between the samples of P. t. schweinfurthii and P. t. verus is striking, although it cannot be determined if this disparity represents a subspecies difference or simply population differences expressed in two different subspecies. While life-history data are unavailable for the population to which the Liberian chimpanzees belonged, the difference in M1 emergence ages between these individuals and those from Kanyawara still suggests caution when attempting even broad life-history inference in fossil apes and hominins based on age at M1 emergence.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom102823:1
dc.relation.ispartofpageto102823:10
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Human Evolution
dc.relation.ispartofvolume145
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEvolutionary Biology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchAnthropology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchArchaeology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode0603
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1601
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode2101
dc.subject.keywordsDental development
dc.subject.keywordsDental histology
dc.subject.keywordsDental variation
dc.subject.keywordsGreat apes
dc.subject.keywordsLife history
dc.titleAge at first molar emergence in Pan troglodytes verus and variation in the timing of molar emergence among free-living chimpanzees
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKelley, J; Schwartz, GT; Smith, TM, Age at first molar emergence in Pan troglodytes verus and variation in the timing of molar emergence among free-living chimpanzees, Journal of Human Evolution, 2020, 145, pp. 102823:1-102823:10
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-04-27
dc.date.updated2020-07-15T22:15:43Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorSmith, Tanya M.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record