Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHughes, Lynda J
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Marion L
dc.contributor.authorJones, Cindy
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Amy NB
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-16T02:49:26Z
dc.date.available2020-07-16T02:49:26Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1471-5953
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102701
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/395492
dc.description.abstractAssessment of fitness for practice in the nursing student population is an essential yet challenging component of nursing education. The aim of this research was to describe the development and preliminary validation of the Assess-Safe instrument that explores assessors' experiences of grading nursing student performances in clinical courses when that performance is not a clear pass or fail. A 3 phase approach was used to develop and psychometrically test the instrument. Phase 1 involved the development of a pool of items following a literature review, coupled with findings from qualitative data. In phase 2, an expert panel rated the items for clarity and relevance, reducing the item pool. Assessors of Australian undergraduate nursing students from industry and academia were recruited for this study. A sample of 149 assessors across industry and academia completed the resultant survey to pilot test the instrument; constituting Phase 3. A high content validity index score of 0.95 was achieved through expert review. Construct validity using factor analysis revealed four factors including: assessor support; process support; assessor introspection; and student support. The Assess-Safe instrument achieved good internal reliability with an overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.77; and sub-scale scores ranging from 0.71 to 0.79. The Assess-Safe instrument demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties and has utility for education programmes, research and policy development across a variety of practice based professions. Nonetheless, further psychometric validation is warranted.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom102701:1
dc.relation.ispartofpageto102701:8
dc.relation.ispartofjournalNurse Education in Practice
dc.relation.ispartofvolume43
dc.subject.fieldofresearchNursing
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCurriculum and Pedagogy
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1110
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1302
dc.subject.keywordsScience & Technology
dc.subject.keywordsLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject.keywordsFitness for practice
dc.subject.keywordsMarginal performances
dc.titleMeasuring assessors' experiences of grading marginal student performances in clinical assessments - The assess-safe tool: Development and preliminary psychometric validation
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHughes, LJ; Mitchell, ML; Jones, C; Johnston, ANB, Measuring assessors' experiences of grading marginal student performances in clinical assessments - The assess-safe tool: Development and preliminary psychometric validation, Nurse Education in Practice, 2020, 43, pp. 102701:102701:8
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-01-15
dc.date.updated2020-07-16T02:45:50Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorMitchell, Marion L.
gro.griffith.authorJohnston, Amy N.
gro.griffith.authorHughes, Lynda J.
gro.griffith.authorJones, Cindy J.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record