Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, Melanieen_US
dc.contributor.editorNoëlle Quénivet and Shilan Shah-Davisen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T15:54:17Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T15:54:17Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.date.modified2011-07-22T06:36:16Z
dc.identifier.isbn9789067043113en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/39579
dc.description.abstractThis chapter addresses the Draft Convention on the Criminal Accountability of UN Officials and Experts on Mission as drafted by the Group of Legal Experts at the end of 2006. The Draft Convention arose out of a mandate given by the UN Secretary-General to the Group of Legal Experts. The mandate was to determine how to ensure accountability of UN staff and experts on mission with respect to criminal acts committed in peacekeeping operations. The need for examination of such issues arose from the incidences of sexual abuse and exploitation that have been committed by peacekeeping personnel in recent years. Ultimately, ensuring accountability for criminal misconduct by peacekeepers is a question of jurisdiction. The Group's main recommendation is that jurisdictional priority be given to the host state, and this is echoed in the text of the Draft Convention. The Group states the aim of the convention to be the creation of "conditions which make it easier for any applicable immunity to be waived, without prejudice to the rights of the alleged offender". The draft convention "sets out obligations on the part of States parties to take measures to investigate, arrest, prosecute and extradite offenders and to render mutual legal assistance [and] to protect the rights of victims". Taking into account that this is only a first draft of a potential convention, there are many questions that arise, some of which will be addressed by this paper. Such questions include: What would a convention achieve that other UN rules and regulations would not? What are the strengths and the limitations of the Draft Convention? How can the effectiveness of the Draft Convention in preventing and prosecuting criminal conduct by peacekeepers, in particular sexual abuse and exploitation, be maximised? Will a convention solve the current problem of impunity for peacekeeping criminal misconduct?en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherTMC Asser Pressen_US
dc.publisher.placeThe Hague, Netherlandsen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789067043113en_US
dc.relation.ispartofbooktitleInternational Law and Armed Conflict: Challenges in the 21st Centuryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofchapter3en_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom57en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto75en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchHuman Rights Lawen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchInternational Law (excl. International Trade Law)en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode180114en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode180116en_US
dc.titleIssues of the Draft Convention on the Criminal Accountability of United Nations Officials and Experts on Missionen_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
dc.type.descriptionB1 - Book Chapters (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeB - Book Chaptersen_US
gro.date.issued2010
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Book chapters
    Contains book chapters authored by Griffith authors.

Show simple item record