• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Little Doubt That CBT Works for Pediatric OCD

    Author(s)
    Storch, Eric A
    Peris, Tara S
    De Nadai, Alessandro
    Piacentini, John
    Bloch, Michael
    Cervin, Matti
    McGuire, Joseph
    Farrell, Lara J
    McCracken, James T
    McKay, Dean
    Riemann, Bradley C
    Wagner, Aureen Pinto
    Franklin, Martin
    Schneider, Sophie C
    Walkup, John T
    Williams, Laurel
    Abramowitz, Jonathan S
    Stewart, S Evelyn
    Fitzgerald, Kate D
    Goodman, Wayne K
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Farrell, Lara J.
    Year published
    2020
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    We write with great concern in response to the recent systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) by Uhre et al. 1 Although the authors’ results consistently support the clinical efficacy of CBT for pediatric OCD, we expect that, much like ourselves, readers will be confused by the discordant and inappropriate conclusions that they put forward. These conclusions stem from the authors’ application and interpretation of their particular qualitative methods, which could lead important stakeholders (eg, parents, patients, clinicians, and payers) to ...
    View more >
    We write with great concern in response to the recent systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) by Uhre et al. 1 Although the authors’ results consistently support the clinical efficacy of CBT for pediatric OCD, we expect that, much like ourselves, readers will be confused by the discordant and inappropriate conclusions that they put forward. These conclusions stem from the authors’ application and interpretation of their particular qualitative methods, which could lead important stakeholders (eg, parents, patients, clinicians, and payers) to wrongly discount clear evidence for what is known to be the best evidence-based therapy for pediatric OCD.
    View less >
    Journal Title
    Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
    Volume
    59
    Issue
    7
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2020.01.026
    Subject
    Biomedical and clinical sciences
    Psychology
    Social Sciences
    Science & Technology
    Life Sciences & Biomedicine
    Psychology, Developmental
    Pediatrics
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/395887
    Collection
    • Journal articles

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E
    • TEQSA: PRV12076

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander