Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStorch, Eric A
dc.contributor.authorPeris, Tara S
dc.contributor.authorDe Nadai, Alessandro
dc.contributor.authorPiacentini, John
dc.contributor.authorBloch, Michael
dc.contributor.authorCervin, Matti
dc.contributor.authorMcGuire, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorFarrell, Lara J
dc.contributor.authorMcCracken, James T
dc.contributor.authorMcKay, Dean
dc.contributor.authorRiemann, Bradley C
dc.contributor.authorWagner, Aureen Pinto
dc.contributor.authorFranklin, Martin
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Sophie C
dc.contributor.authorWalkup, John T
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Laurel
dc.contributor.authorAbramowitz, Jonathan S
dc.contributor.authorStewart, S Evelyn
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, Kate D
dc.contributor.authorGoodman, Wayne K
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-30T00:13:51Z
dc.date.available2020-07-30T00:13:51Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0890-8567
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jaac.2020.01.026
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/395887
dc.description.abstractWe write with great concern in response to the recent systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) by Uhre et al. 1 Although the authors’ results consistently support the clinical efficacy of CBT for pediatric OCD, we expect that, much like ourselves, readers will be confused by the discordant and inappropriate conclusions that they put forward. These conclusions stem from the authors’ application and interpretation of their particular qualitative methods, which could lead important stakeholders (eg, parents, patients, clinicians, and payers) to wrongly discount clear evidence for what is known to be the best evidence-based therapy for pediatric OCD.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom785
dc.relation.ispartofpageto787
dc.relation.ispartofissue7
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
dc.relation.ispartofvolume59
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBiomedical and clinical sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPsychology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode32
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode52
dc.subject.keywordsSocial Sciences
dc.subject.keywordsScience & Technology
dc.subject.keywordsLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject.keywordsPsychology, Developmental
dc.subject.keywordsPediatrics
dc.titleLittle Doubt That CBT Works for Pediatric OCD
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC3 - Articles (Letter/ Note)
dcterms.bibliographicCitationStorch, EA; Peris, TS; De Nadai, A; Piacentini, J; Bloch, M; Cervin, M; McGuire, J; Farrell, LJ; McCracken, JT; McKay, D; Riemann, BC; Wagner, AP; Franklin, M; Schneider, SC; Walkup, JT; Williams, L; Abramowitz, JS; Stewart, SE; Fitzgerald, KD; Goodman, WK, Little Doubt That CBT Works for Pediatric OCD, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2020, 59 (7), pp. 785-787
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-04-24
dc.date.updated2020-07-29T00:43:58Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorFarrell, Lara J.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record