Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorErku, Daniel A
dc.contributor.authorGartner, Coral E
dc.contributor.authorMorphett, Kylie
dc.contributor.authorSteadman, Kathryn J
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-24T00:23:54Z
dc.date.available2020-08-24T00:23:54Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1462-2203
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ntr/ntz046
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/396649
dc.description.abstractAIMS:This review explores the (1) beliefs and attitudes of health care professionals (HCPs) toward electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) including use as a smoking cessation aid and/or harm reduction, safety and regulation, and (2) the extent and content of patient-HCP communication about ENDS. METHODS:PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched to identify articles published since 2003. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklists were used to assess the quality of studies. Thematic synthesis was used to analyze qualitative data. RESULTS:A total of 45 articles (32 quantitative, 12 qualitative, and 1 mixed) were included. There was wide variation regarding beliefs about the efficacy of ENDS as a cessation aid. Although the majority of HCPs believes that ENDS are safer than combustible cigarettes, they also have concern about the short and long-term safety of ENDS, uptake by adolescents, and the potential for ENDS to act as a "gateway" to smoking cigarettes. Beliefs about ENDS are influenced by media stories and experiences provided by patients. Although most HCPs do not proactively recommend ENDS, they are more likely to support ENDS use among patients with smoking related comorbidities, heavy smokers with previous unsuccessful quit attempts, or patients who express interest in trying them. CONCLUSIONS:Overall, HCPs hold diverse views about the efficacy of ENDS and expressed wariness over their potential health effects. HCP endorsement of ENDS use seems to depend largely on patient health status, the presence of other competing risk factors and patient preferences. IMPLICATION:Although evidence on safety and efficacy of ENDS is emerging, HCPs should be honest with their clients, stating that the long-term safety is not yet established but what is known is that they appear to be a lower risk alternative to cigarettes. Our review highlights a need for further training and support for HCPs regarding ENDS use, which would enable them to guide their clients in making evidence-based decisions.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom619
dc.relation.ispartofpageto629
dc.relation.ispartofissue5
dc.relation.ispartofjournalNicotine & Tobacco Research
dc.relation.ispartofvolume22
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchHealth services and systems
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPublic health
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode3202
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4203
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4206
dc.titleBeliefs and Self-reported Practices of Health Care Professionals Regarding Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review and Synthesis
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationErku, DA; Gartner, CE; Morphett, K; Steadman, KJ, Beliefs and Self-reported Practices of Health Care Professionals Regarding Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review and Synthesis, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2020, 22 (5), pp. 619-629
dc.date.updated2020-08-21T04:55:47Z
dc.description.versionAccepted Manuscript (AM)
gro.rights.copyright© 2020 Oxford University Press. This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Briefings in Bioinformatics following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Beliefs and Self-reported Practices of Health Care Professionals Regarding Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review and Synthesis, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2020, 22 (5), pp. 619-629 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntz046.
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorErku, Daniel


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record