dc.contributor.author | Leiva, Diego | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-08T02:46:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-08T02:46:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2046-3162 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1108/AEDS-08-2019-0127 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/397178 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose:
China's experience of investing in Latin America in one of the main sectors included in the BRI architecture, railways, has faced significant challenges: only one of four Chinese potential railway projects in Latin America has materialised. The purpose of this paper is to explore these challenges and to provide an explanation focusing on the importance of the “domestic politics” factor.
Design/methodology/approach:
The paper proposes a comparative study of four cases, developing a qualitative analysis based on an in-depth review of the literature and primary and secondary sources of information.
Findings:
The findings suggest that domestic politics played a significant role in the outcomes of the Brazil–Peru Bi-Oceanic railway (changes in government), in Argentina's Belgrano Cargas modernisation project (multiple “domestic politics” factors, such as a presidential campaign), in Venezuela's failed Tinaco-Anaco high-speed train project (authoritarian turn/country's stability) and in Mexico's Querétaro-Ciudad de México high-speed train project (corruption and popular contestation). The paper suggests that one should not expect an easy or fast projection of the BRI in the region, at least in the short- and mid-term, because becoming familiar with the domestic politics of Latin American is a complex and gradual task.
Originality/value:
The particular impact of the political risks related to domestic politics in the Chinese Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Latin America has not been extensively explored, especially in the railway sector. This paper intends to contribute to this literature gap by analysing four cases of Chinese investment in railways in Latin America, an area that has received little attention in the studies of the Chinese FDI in the region, and proposing an explanation of their outcomes focusing on the “domestic politics” factor. | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Yes | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited | |
dc.relation.ispartofjournal | Asian Education and Development Studies | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Education systems | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Curriculum and pedagogy | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Specialist studies in education | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Political science | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 3903 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 3901 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 3904 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 4408 | |
dc.subject.keywords | Social Sciences | |
dc.subject.keywords | Education & Educational Research | |
dc.subject.keywords | China | |
dc.subject.keywords | Latin America | |
dc.subject.keywords | BRI | |
dc.title | BRI and railways in Latin America: how important are domestic politics? | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dc.type.description | C1 - Articles | |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Leiva, D, BRI and railways in Latin America: how important are domestic politics?, Asian Education and Development Studies, 2020 | |
dc.date.updated | 2020-09-08T02:44:31Z | |
gro.description.notepublic | This publication has been entered in Griffith Research Online as an advanced online version. | |
gro.hasfulltext | No Full Text | |
gro.griffith.author | Leiva, Diego | |