Conciliation versus mediation of complaints against police: Lessons from the Queensland experience

View/ Open
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Riley, M
Prenzler, T
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2020
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Since the 1990s, alternative dispute resolution practices for dealing with citizen-initiated complaints against police, such as conciliation, have progressively been trialled and implemented in police services across Australia. The Queensland Police Service was one of the most proactive services in trialling independently facilitated complaints mediation programs-in collaboration with its oversight agency. However, despite repeated positive outcomes, the Service refrained from actively using mediation, preferring instead to use management dominated informal resolution (conciliation). This process, characterised by police ...
View more >Since the 1990s, alternative dispute resolution practices for dealing with citizen-initiated complaints against police, such as conciliation, have progressively been trialled and implemented in police services across Australia. The Queensland Police Service was one of the most proactive services in trialling independently facilitated complaints mediation programs-in collaboration with its oversight agency. However, despite repeated positive outcomes, the Service refrained from actively using mediation, preferring instead to use management dominated informal resolution (conciliation). This process, characterised by police investigating police, continues to limit complainant participation by denying them the opportunity to meet face-to-face with the subject officer. Yet the literature cites mediation, especially practices based on restorative principles as beneficial because it brings disputing parties together in dialogue that is educative for both parties, reparatory, and better satisfies complainants' aspirations for an inclusive and neutral complaints system, while data from mediated complaints can also be used to inform police conduct improvement strategies. Complaints mediation is available upon request within the Queensland Police Service, however, it is not widely promoted, and is internally facilitated. In view of this, an historical account of the application of mediation and conciliation to the Queensland Police Service complaints system is examined in this paper to answer the question why conciliation has become the default approach and mediation continues to be largely ignored. This is done through a qualitative analysis of publicly available documents and semistructured interviews with key stakeholders. The findings reveal that the 1992 Mediation Pilot was very successful. However, the Queensland Police Service adopted conciliation because it was cheaper and, they claim, better aligned with managing behavioural improvements. Three decades on, there has been little evidence of this, while the literature clearly shows that mediation should be a key component of any police complaints and discipline system.
View less >
View more >Since the 1990s, alternative dispute resolution practices for dealing with citizen-initiated complaints against police, such as conciliation, have progressively been trialled and implemented in police services across Australia. The Queensland Police Service was one of the most proactive services in trialling independently facilitated complaints mediation programs-in collaboration with its oversight agency. However, despite repeated positive outcomes, the Service refrained from actively using mediation, preferring instead to use management dominated informal resolution (conciliation). This process, characterised by police investigating police, continues to limit complainant participation by denying them the opportunity to meet face-to-face with the subject officer. Yet the literature cites mediation, especially practices based on restorative principles as beneficial because it brings disputing parties together in dialogue that is educative for both parties, reparatory, and better satisfies complainants' aspirations for an inclusive and neutral complaints system, while data from mediated complaints can also be used to inform police conduct improvement strategies. Complaints mediation is available upon request within the Queensland Police Service, however, it is not widely promoted, and is internally facilitated. In view of this, an historical account of the application of mediation and conciliation to the Queensland Police Service complaints system is examined in this paper to answer the question why conciliation has become the default approach and mediation continues to be largely ignored. This is done through a qualitative analysis of publicly available documents and semistructured interviews with key stakeholders. The findings reveal that the 1992 Mediation Pilot was very successful. However, the Queensland Police Service adopted conciliation because it was cheaper and, they claim, better aligned with managing behavioural improvements. Three decades on, there has been little evidence of this, while the literature clearly shows that mediation should be a key component of any police complaints and discipline system.
View less >
Journal Title
Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law and Society
Volume
21
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
© 2020 Western Criminology Review. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.
Subject
Criminology