Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaraksha, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorGrant, Gary
dc.contributor.authorDavey, Andrew K
dc.contributor.authorAnoopkumar-Dukie, Shailendra
dc.contributor.editorChova, LG
dc.contributor.editorBelenguer, DM
dc.contributor.editorMartinez, AL
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T15:34:02Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T15:34:02Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.date.modified2011-08-22T06:33:40Z
dc.identifier.issn2340-1117
dc.identifier.refurihttp://www.iated.org/edulearn11/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/39731
dc.description.abstractObjective Develop and compare the educational benefit of an interactive pharmacology computer assisted learning (CAL) tool, designed according to educational theory, versus the conventional lecture in a pilot study. Evaluate student satisfaction with the tool, identify its place in pharmacology education, and evaluate the educational benefit it may have on student performance using a short-term recall assessment. Methods A computer-based flash animation describing two gastrointestinal drug mechanisms of action was developed. The study group comprised 75 third-year pharmacy students at Griffith University. Ethical approval was granted by the Griffith University Human Ethics Committee. Participants were randomly allocated into four groups, Lecture + CAL (N = 23), CAL (N = 22), Lecture (N = 13) and No intervention (N = 17). Performance was assessed using multiple choice questions. Time taken to answer each question and the quiz as a whole was also compared between the four groups. Participants satisfaction with the tool was also measured using a 5-point Likert scale. Data were analysed statistically by ANOVA testing using GraphPad InStat software (version 3.10). Probability (p) values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results Performance as measured by mean test scores was significantly different (p<0.05) in two comparisons only: the Lecture + CAL versus Lecture groups and the Lecture + CAL versus No intervention groups with the Lecture + CAL group outperforming the other groups in both cases. No significant difference (p>0.05) was found by comparing the time to undertake the quiz between the four groups. In addition no significant difference was discovered by comparing the time spent to finish each question between the groups. The majority of participants were satisfied with the CAL and found it easy to use. Conclusion The results of the present study suggest that these self-developed CALs supplement lectures and have the potential to improve students' performance and improve knowledge transfer. Keywords: Computer assisted learning, CAL, E-learning, blended learning, performance assessment.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.description.publicationstatusYes
dc.format.extent357509 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherInternational Association of Technology, Education and Development (IATED)
dc.publisher.placeBarcelona, Spain
dc.publisher.urihttp://library.iated.org/view/KARAKSHA2011DEV
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationY
dc.relation.ispartofconferencename3rd International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN)
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleEDULEARN11: 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2011-07-04
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2011-07-06
dc.relation.ispartoflocationBarcelona, SPAIN
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom3580
dc.relation.ispartofpageto3589
dc.rights.retentionY
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEducation not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode139999
dc.titleDevelopment and evaluation of computer-assisted learning (CAL) teaching tools compared to the conventional didactic lecture in pharmacology education
dc.typeConference output
dc.type.descriptionE1 - Conferences
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publications
gro.facultyGriffith Health, School of Pharmacy
gro.rights.copyright© 2011 IATED. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this conference please refer to the conference's website or contact the authors.
gro.date.issued2011
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorGrant, Gary D.
gro.griffith.authorAnoopkumar-Dukie, Shailendra
gro.griffith.authorKaraksha, Abdullah
gro.griffith.authorDavey, Andrew


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record