• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Theses
    • Theses - Higher Degree by Research
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Theses
    • Theses - Higher Degree by Research
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Unsettled Settlements of Environmental Risk: Accounting for hazardous legacies, risky environments, and settlement exposures

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Rickson, Kara Final Thesis_Redacted.pdf (4.198Mb)
    Author(s)
    Rickson, Kara E.
    Primary Supervisor
    Baum, Scott
    Other Supervisors
    Ferreira, Jo-Anne L
    Woolcock, Geoffrey W
    Year published
    2020-09-07
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This study examines struggles over settlement exposures to environmental risk, and the ways socio-environmental legacies and commitments are problematised, challenged, transformed, or otherwise ‘unsettled’. Inquiry is directed to discursive and material processes that shape legacy exposures and risk commitments ‘in place’, yet remain relatively neglected in scholarship, policy, and planning. Drawing upon critical, constructivist, and conflict perspectives, especially within environmental sociology and the sociologies of risk and disaster, the study systematically addresses issues of power in the production and placement of ...
    View more >
    This study examines struggles over settlement exposures to environmental risk, and the ways socio-environmental legacies and commitments are problematised, challenged, transformed, or otherwise ‘unsettled’. Inquiry is directed to discursive and material processes that shape legacy exposures and risk commitments ‘in place’, yet remain relatively neglected in scholarship, policy, and planning. Drawing upon critical, constructivist, and conflict perspectives, especially within environmental sociology and the sociologies of risk and disaster, the study systematically addresses issues of power in the production and placement of risk, hazard, and exposure, and in related understanding of impacts, and response. Grounded in a qualitative methodology, a case approach and mixed methods are employed to identify and investigate three environmental risk controversies situated in the coastal, mainland Moreton Bay Region in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Methods used include the analysis of documentary and archival material, a household survey, and semi-structured interviews with self-selected residents who were survey respondents, and with purposively sampled community group representatives. The cases investigate, in turn, contentious settlement exposures related to the ‘encroachment’ of hazardous industries and a large chemical factory fire, catastrophic flooding and the manageability of flood risk, and the acceptable impacts of climate change adaptation itself. Analysis in each case was directed to the following: predominant problem and solution framing; critical attention to government roles in risk creation; issues of allocation and claims of tolerability, acceptability, and responsibility for risk acceptance; and related contestation and prospects for transformation. ‘Placing’ environmental risk controversies in this way supported consideration of the nature, significance, and limits of any related (symbolic or material) unsettling. The incidents, disasters, and disputes under study included challenges to the authority of technical and scientific knowledge, its appropriate application in local contexts, and the accessibility and acceptability of paths and processes for determining the stakes and commitments of settlement. Interpreted as cases of encroachment, fragmentation, and displacement, powerful risk commitments were argued to remain ‘out of frame’ in important ways. Enduring socio-institutional and politico-legal commitments to the accommodation, accumulation, and domestication of risk, hazard, and exposure were evident across the cases. The hazardous legacies of past land-use decisions, for instance, were identified but naturalised in ways that served to enable the advancement of certain trajectories, forms, and locations of development. It was argued that these ongoing risk commitments, and challenges to them, are best understood as inseparable from both local ‘risk landscapes’ and broader claims to the legitimate terms and bounds of governance, environment, and settlement.
    View less >
    Thesis Type
    Thesis (PhD Doctorate)
    Degree Program
    Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
    School
    School of Environment and Sc
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/3946
    Copyright Statement
    The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise.
    Subject
    Environmental Risk
    hazardous legacies
    risky environments
    settlement exposures
    socio-environmental legacies
    environmental sociology
    Moreton Bay Region
    Southeast Queensland
    Australia
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/397587
    Collection
    • Theses - Higher Degree by Research

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E
    • TEQSA: PRV12076

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander