Evaluation of an intervention to improve nutrition intakes among elective colorectal surgery patients: a mixed-methods pilot study

View/ Open
Embargoed until: 2021-09-14
Author(s)
Rattray, Megan
Desbrow, Ben
Marshall, Andrea P
von Papen, Michael
Roberts, Shelley
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2020
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background:
Timely and adequate nutrition after surgery is important. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an intervention, developed using an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach, designed to improve oral intake among postoperative colorectal patients.
Methods:
A pre/post, mixed-methods pilot study was undertaken at a tertiary teaching hospital in Australia. Patients who had undergone elective colorectal surgery and were admitted to the ward where ten nutrition-related strategies had been implemented were included. Quantitative data, including patient demographics, timing and type of nutrition ...
View more >Background: Timely and adequate nutrition after surgery is important. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an intervention, developed using an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach, designed to improve oral intake among postoperative colorectal patients. Methods: A pre/post, mixed-methods pilot study was undertaken at a tertiary teaching hospital in Australia. Patients who had undergone elective colorectal surgery and were admitted to the ward where ten nutrition-related strategies had been implemented were included. Quantitative data, including patient demographics, timing and type of nutrition consumed, and protein and energy intakes were collected pre/post intervention via chart audits, direct observations and verbal clarification. Qualitative data on patients’ (n=18) responses to the intervention were collected through one-on-one, semi-structured interviews and analyzed using inductive content analysis. Results: A total of 64 patients were observed (30 pre- and 34 post-intervention). Significant improvements were seen for the following outcomes (presented as median (IQR), pre- vs. post-intervention): time to first dietary intake (h) (15.7(7.4-22.5) vs. 4.9(3.7-14.2)); patient energy intakes (kJ) on day one (1719(947-2200) vs. 3530(2192-5169)) and day two (2506(1071-3749) vs. 4144(2987-5889)); and patient protein intakes (g) on day one (3.3(1.8-11.2) vs. 30.3(20-45)) and day two (10.8(3.5-29.9) vs. 39.6(30.7-59.0)). Prescription of free fluids as first diet type increased from 13% to 79% pre/post-intervention. There were no significant differences in time to first solid dietary intake (h) (86.1(60.1-104.0) vs. 69.2(46.1-115.5)) and overall proportion of patients who met both their estimated energy and protein requirements while in hospital pre/post-intervention (22% vs. 37%). Patients reported positive experiences with the intervention. Conclusion: A multifaceted intervention developed using an iKT approach has the potential to improve oral intakes among patients who undergo colorectal surgery. A larger scale trial is required to confirm these findings and assess the impact of the intervention on clinical outcomes and costs.
View less >
View more >Background: Timely and adequate nutrition after surgery is important. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an intervention, developed using an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach, designed to improve oral intake among postoperative colorectal patients. Methods: A pre/post, mixed-methods pilot study was undertaken at a tertiary teaching hospital in Australia. Patients who had undergone elective colorectal surgery and were admitted to the ward where ten nutrition-related strategies had been implemented were included. Quantitative data, including patient demographics, timing and type of nutrition consumed, and protein and energy intakes were collected pre/post intervention via chart audits, direct observations and verbal clarification. Qualitative data on patients’ (n=18) responses to the intervention were collected through one-on-one, semi-structured interviews and analyzed using inductive content analysis. Results: A total of 64 patients were observed (30 pre- and 34 post-intervention). Significant improvements were seen for the following outcomes (presented as median (IQR), pre- vs. post-intervention): time to first dietary intake (h) (15.7(7.4-22.5) vs. 4.9(3.7-14.2)); patient energy intakes (kJ) on day one (1719(947-2200) vs. 3530(2192-5169)) and day two (2506(1071-3749) vs. 4144(2987-5889)); and patient protein intakes (g) on day one (3.3(1.8-11.2) vs. 30.3(20-45)) and day two (10.8(3.5-29.9) vs. 39.6(30.7-59.0)). Prescription of free fluids as first diet type increased from 13% to 79% pre/post-intervention. There were no significant differences in time to first solid dietary intake (h) (86.1(60.1-104.0) vs. 69.2(46.1-115.5)) and overall proportion of patients who met both their estimated energy and protein requirements while in hospital pre/post-intervention (22% vs. 37%). Patients reported positive experiences with the intervention. Conclusion: A multifaceted intervention developed using an iKT approach has the potential to improve oral intakes among patients who undergo colorectal surgery. A larger scale trial is required to confirm these findings and assess the impact of the intervention on clinical outcomes and costs.
View less >
Journal Title
Nutrition
Copyright Statement
© 2020 Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, providing that the work is properly cited.
Note
This publication has been entered in Griffith Research Online as an advanced online version.
Subject
Clinical Sciences
Medical and Health Sciences