Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHagger, Martin S
dc.contributor.authorKoch, Severine
dc.contributor.authorChatzisarantis, Nikos LD
dc.contributor.authorOrbell, Sheina
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-01T07:00:00Z
dc.date.available2020-10-01T07:00:00Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0033-2909
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/bul0000118
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/398082
dc.description.abstractAccording to the common-sense model of self-regulation, individuals form lay representations of illnesses that guide coping procedures to manage illness threat. We meta-analyzed studies adopting the model to (a) examine the intercorrelations among illness representation dimensions, coping strategies, and illness outcomes; (b) test the sufficiency of a process model in which relations between illness representations and outcomes were mediated by coping strategies; and (c) test effects of moderators on model relations. Studies adopting the common-sense model in chronic illness (k = 254) were subjected to random-effects meta-analysis. The pattern of zero-order corrected correlations among illness representation dimensions (identity, consequences, timeline, perceived control, illness coherence, emotional representations), coping strategies (avoidance, cognitive reappraisal, emotion venting, problem-focused generic, problem-focused specific, seeking social support), and illness outcomes (disease state, distress, well-being, physical, role, and social functioning) was consistent with previous analyses. Meta-analytic path analyses supported a process model that included direct effects of illness representations on outcomes and indirect effects mediated by coping. Emotional representations and perceived control were consistently related to illness-related and functional outcomes via, respectively, lower and greater employment of coping strategies to deal with symptoms or manage treatment. Representations signaling threat (consequences, identity) had specific positive and negative indirect effects on outcomes through problem- and emotion-focused coping strategies. There was little evidence of moderation of model effects by study design, illness type and context, and study quality. A revised process model is proposed to guide future research which includes effects of moderators, individual differences, and beliefs about coping and treatment.
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Association
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom1117
dc.relation.ispartofpageto1154
dc.relation.ispartofissue11
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPsychological Bulletin
dc.relation.ispartofvolume143
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMarketingen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1505en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1701en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1702en_US
dc.subject.keywordsSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.keywordsPsychology, Multidisciplinaryen_US
dc.subject.keywordschronic illnessen_US
dc.subject.keywordscoping proceduresen_US
dc.titleThe Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation: Meta-Analysis and Test of a Process Model
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHagger, MS; Koch, S; Chatzisarantis, NLD; Orbell, S, The Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation: Meta-Analysis and Test of a Process Model, Psychological Bulletin, 2017, 143 (11), pp. 1117-1154
dc.date.updated2020-10-01T06:57:44Z
dc.description.versionAccepted Manuscript (AM)en_US
gro.rights.copyright© 2020 American Psycological Association. This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record. Reproduced here in accordance with publisher policy. Please refer to the journal link for access to the definitive, published version.en_US
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorHagger, Martin S.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record