Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAnton, Don
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-06T23:47:01Z
dc.date.available2020-10-06T23:47:01Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.doi10.2139/ssrn.2876382
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/398140
dc.description.abstractIn April 2016, Timor-Leste initiated compulsory conciliation proceedings against Australia under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). This is the first time a Conciliation Commission has been constituted for the purpose of aiding the settlement of a maritime boundary dispute under UNCLOS. This brief comment considers possible arguments about the competence of the Commission and the admissibility of the Timor-Leste's claim.
dc.publisherGriffith University Law School
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGriffith Law School Research Paper
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPolitical Science
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1606
dc.titleCompulsory Conciliation of the Long-Running Timor Sea Boundary Dispute between Timor-Leste and Australia
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC2 - Articles (Other)
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAnton, D, Compulsory Conciliation of the Long-Running Timor Sea Boundary Dispute between Timor-Leste and Australia
dc.date.updated2020-10-06T23:28:45Z
dc.description.versionVersion of Record (VoR)
gro.rights.copyright© 2016 Griffith University Law School and the Author(s). The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the publisher’s website for further information.
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorAnton, Don K.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Reports
    Contains reports by Griffith authors published for government agencies, industry and other organisations.

Show simple item record