Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWeng (Han), Zhe Han
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Xihui
dc.contributor.authorEldridge, Simon
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hailong
dc.contributor.authorRose, Terry
dc.contributor.authorRose, Mick
dc.contributor.authorRust, Josh
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Bhupinder Pal
dc.contributor.authorTavakkoli, Ehsan
dc.contributor.authorTang, Caixian
dc.contributor.authorOu, Huiping
dc.contributor.authorVan Zwieten, Lukas
dc.description.abstractSugarcane (Saccharum spp.) farming systems globally have largely transitioned away from burning the crop prior to harvest. Harvesting the sugarcane crop ‘green’ results in large volumes of biomass residues being left on the soil. Despite this, there is little evidence for increased soil organic carbon stocks. We investigated the role of surface application or incorporation (0–200 mm soil layer) of harvest residues (15 t dry weight residues ha−1) and its biochar (5.4 t ha−1 based on the quantity of resource recovered after pyrolysis) on the priming of native soil organic carbon (SOC), the mineralisation of the organic amendments and the source of crop nitrogen (N) uptake (soil, organic amendment or urea). All treatments received urea at 180 kg N ha−1. To achieve the separation of C and N sources, dual 13C and 15N-enriched sugarcane residues and corresponding biochar (350 °C) were used in an 84-d controlled environment study. A three-pool isotope mixing model, utilising two levels of 13C enrichment in residue (16.6‰ and 23.8‰) and biochar (16.8‰ and 24.1‰), was also applied to partition the C from three sources: 1) root respiration, 2) organic amendment mineralisation, and 3) SOC priming. The SOC mineralisation was increased following both surface-applied and incorporated residues, over the nil organic amendment (control) by 72.3 and 78.3 CO2–C m−2 respectively over 84 days. In contrast, biochar lowered the mineralisation of SOC by 62.9 g CO2–C m−2 compared to the control. The cumulative mineralisation of sugarcane residue biochar (18.9 g CO2–C m−2) was lower (P = 0.03) than surface applied residue (50.1 g CO2–C m−2) and incorporated residue (71.9 g CO2–C m−2) over the study period. While there were no differences in total crop N uptake between the organic-amended soils and the control, the source of N was significantly different. The sugarcane plants utilised 31.0% and 29.4% of the supplied urea N in the nil organic-amended control and biochar treatment, respectively. This was significantly reduced to 24.8% and 20.6% in the surface residue and incorporated residue treatments, respectively. In comparison, the plant uptake of N derived from the organic amendments was 27.8%, 15.4% and 6.4% from incorporated residues, surface-applied residues and biochar, respectively (P < 0.001). Results suggest that the increased mineralisation of SOC, partly driven by the high C:N ratio (73:1) and the unbalanced nutrient stoichiometry may lead to low SOC accumulation from surface residue application and that sugarcane residue biochar results in SOC stabilisation and an increase in the use efficiency of fertiliser N in sugarcane systems.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalSoil Biology and Biochemistryen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEnvironmental Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBiological Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchAgricultural and Veterinary Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.keywordsScience & Technologyen_US
dc.subject.keywordsLife Sciences & Biomedicineen_US
dc.subject.keywordsSoil Scienceen_US
dc.titlePriming of soil organic carbon induced by sugarcane residues and its biochar control the source of nitrogen for plant uptake: A dual C-13 and N-15 isotope three-source-partitioning studyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articlesen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWeng (Han), ZH; Liu, X; Eldridge, S; Wang, H; Rose, T; Rose, M; Rust, J; Singh, BP; Tavakkoli, E; Tang, C; Ou, H; Van Zwieten, L, Priming of soil organic carbon induced by sugarcane residues and its biochar control the source of nitrogen for plant uptake: A dual C-13 and N-15 isotope three-source-partitioning study, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 146, pp. 107792en_US
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorVan Zwieten, Lukas

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record