Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShi, Qi
dc.contributor.authorLi, Bin
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-04T01:29:37Z
dc.date.available2020-11-04T01:29:37Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1608-1625
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/16081625.2020.1787851
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/398945
dc.description.abstractRecent studies advocate two new benchmark models (the Fama-French five-factor model and the Hou, Xue and Zhang four-factor model) with monthly data. Our daily data approach provides considerable supplement to the monthly data approach presented in recent studies. We adopt the advanced bootstrap methodology by replicating the original data sample, and this approach should effectively alleviate the problem of too much noise in the data of daily return. A two-pass cross-sectional regression and GMM with several useful testing statistics are used to more thoroughly diagnose the specifications of the model. The following consistency is observed when using different frequencies of sample data: the evidence indicates that the two newer benchmark models (the Fama-French five-factor model and the Hou, Xue and Zhang four-factor model) outperform the Fama-French three-factor model in estimating a few well-known portfolios (formed on different anomalies). However, several specification tests do not robustly accept the correct specifications of the Fama-French five-factor model and the Hou, Xue and Zhang four-factor model.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherRoutledge: Taylor & Francis Group
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAsia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEconomics
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode38
dc.subject.keywordsSocial Sciences
dc.subject.keywordsBusiness, Finance
dc.subject.keywordsSupplement
dc.titleThe evaluation and comparison of three benchmark asset pricing models with daily data: supplementary evidence
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationShi, Q; Li, B, The evaluation and comparison of three benchmark asset pricing models with daily data: supplementary evidence, Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 2020
dc.date.updated2020-11-04T01:22:01Z
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered in Griffith Research Online as an advanced online version.
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorLi, Bin


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record