dc.contributor.author | Marshalsey, Lorraine | |
dc.contributor.author | Sclater, Madeleine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-12-16T05:16:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-12-16T05:16:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0260-9991 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/jade.12331 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/400285 | |
dc.description.abstract | It would seem that technological campuses of tomorrow have manifested in 2020 as an essential spontaneous response to a world event. This article examines the current crisis in physical art and design studio learning in higher education as a consequence of the COVID‐19 outbreak and the sector’s response to the fast‐track conversion of blended learning to a distributed model. Universities are focusing on virtual community building where group work, ‘crits’ and presentations are being carried out online. Moving assessment and engagement to online formats has consequences for practice‐based art and design courses: distributed learning changes how we teach and learn. This article discusses the implications of art and design studio education in a time of distributed learning. It considers the loss of control over a physically based, practical curriculum and the repercussions for students unable to perform to the depth and rigour required for creative art and design practice. Studio education is considered a signature pedagogy, and has a distinct set of guiding principles such as facilitating critical play, thinking and making, and a pedagogy of ambiguity. This article examines the successes and challenges of moving these pedagogical principles into distributed spaces to support student engagement, using Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) as a research framework. The article also examines pedagogical strategies that support students to engage in physical forms of creative practice that enable them to connect their lived experience in a time of crisis. | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Yes | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Wiley | |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdon | |
dc.relation.ispartofjournal | International Journal of Art and Design Education | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Design | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Design management | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Design practice and methods | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Higher education | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Curriculum and pedagogy | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Creative arts, media and communication curriculum and pedagogy | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Curriculum and pedagogy theory and development | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Visual arts | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 3303 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 330305 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 330306 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 390303 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 3901 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 390101 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 390102 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 3606 | |
dc.title | Together but Apart: creating and supporting online learning communities in an era of distributed studio education | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dc.type.description | C1 - Articles | |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Marshalsey, L; Sclater, M, Together but Apart: creating and supporting online learning communities in an era of distributed studio education, International Journal of Art and Design Education, 2020 | |
dc.date.updated | 2020-12-15T02:49:03Z | |
gro.description.notepublic | This publication has been entered as an advanced online version in Griffith Research Online. | |
gro.hasfulltext | No Full Text | |
gro.griffith.author | Marshalsey, Lorraine Y. | |