Response to: Bright et al. (2018) Internal validation of STRmix™ - A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11-24

Buckleton, John S; Bright, Jo-Anne; Ciecko, Anne; Kruijver, Maarten; Mallinder, Benjamin; Magee, Alan; Malsom, Simon; Moretti, Tamyra; Weitz, Steven; Bille, Todd; Noel, Sarah; Oefelein, Rachel H; Peck, Brian; Kalafut, Timothy; Taylor, Duncan A

doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102198

Author(s)

Buckleton, John S

Bright, Jo-Anne

Ciecko, Anne

Kruijver, Maarten

Mallinder, Benjamin

Magee, Alan

Malsom, Simon

Moretti, Tamyra

Weitz, Steven

Bille, Todd

Noel, Sarah

Oefelein, Rachel H

Peck, Brian

Kalafut, Timothy

Taylor, Duncan A

Griffith University Author(s)

Oefelein, Rachel H.

Year published

2020

Metadata

Show full item record

Abstract

We are writing in response to a recent letter appearing in Forensic Science International: Genetics entitled “Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) internal validation of STRmix™ – A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11–24″, authored by Dennis McNevin, Kirsty Wright, Janet Chaseling, and Mark Barash [1] (hereafter MWCB). In their letter they acknowledge that Bright et al. [2] is a “valuable first step in establishing a foundational validity for mixture interpretation using probabilistic software, as recommended by the PCAST report” and suggest further experiments to “better address ...
View more >We are writing in response to a recent letter appearing in Forensic Science International: Genetics entitled “Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) internal validation of STRmix™ – A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11–24″, authored by Dennis McNevin, Kirsty Wright, Janet Chaseling, and Mark Barash [1] (hereafter MWCB). In their letter they acknowledge that Bright et al. [2] is a “valuable first step in establishing a foundational validity for mixture interpretation using probabilistic software, as recommended by the PCAST report” and suggest further experiments to “better address this issue”.
View less >