• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Response to: Bright et al. (2018) Internal validation of STRmix™ - A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11-24

    Author(s)
    Buckleton, John S
    Bright, Jo-Anne
    Ciecko, Anne
    Kruijver, Maarten
    Mallinder, Benjamin
    Magee, Alan
    Malsom, Simon
    Moretti, Tamyra
    Weitz, Steven
    Bille, Todd
    Noel, Sarah
    Oefelein, Rachel H
    Peck, Brian
    Kalafut, Timothy
    Taylor, Duncan A
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Oefelein, Rachel H.
    Year published
    2020
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    We are writing in response to a recent letter appearing in Forensic Science International: Genetics entitled “Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) internal validation of STRmix™ – A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11–24″, authored by Dennis McNevin, Kirsty Wright, Janet Chaseling, and Mark Barash [1] (hereafter MWCB). In their letter they acknowledge that Bright et al. [2] is a “valuable first step in establishing a foundational validity for mixture interpretation using probabilistic software, as recommended by the PCAST report” and suggest further experiments to “better address ...
    View more >
    We are writing in response to a recent letter appearing in Forensic Science International: Genetics entitled “Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) internal validation of STRmix™ – A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11–24″, authored by Dennis McNevin, Kirsty Wright, Janet Chaseling, and Mark Barash [1] (hereafter MWCB). In their letter they acknowledge that Bright et al. [2] is a “valuable first step in establishing a foundational validity for mixture interpretation using probabilistic software, as recommended by the PCAST report” and suggest further experiments to “better address this issue”.
    View less >
    Journal Title
    Forensic Science International: Genetics
    Volume
    44
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102198
    Subject
    Mathematical Sciences
    Biological Sciences
    Law and Legal Studies
    Science & Technology
    Life Sciences & Biomedicine
    Genetics & Heredity
    Legal Medicine
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/400918
    Collection
    • Journal articles

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander