Response to: Bright et al. (2018) Internal validation of STRmix™ - A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11-24
Author(s)
Buckleton, John S
Bright, Jo-Anne
Ciecko, Anne
Kruijver, Maarten
Mallinder, Benjamin
Magee, Alan
Malsom, Simon
Moretti, Tamyra
Weitz, Steven
Bille, Todd
Noel, Sarah
Oefelein, Rachel H
Peck, Brian
Kalafut, Timothy
Taylor, Duncan A
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2020
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
We are writing in response to a recent letter appearing in Forensic Science International: Genetics entitled “Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) internal validation of STRmix™ – A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11–24″, authored by Dennis McNevin, Kirsty Wright, Janet Chaseling, and Mark Barash [1] (hereafter MWCB). In their letter they acknowledge that Bright et al. [2] is a “valuable first step in establishing a foundational validity for mixture interpretation using probabilistic software, as recommended by the PCAST report” and suggest further experiments to “better address ...
View more >We are writing in response to a recent letter appearing in Forensic Science International: Genetics entitled “Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) internal validation of STRmix™ – A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11–24″, authored by Dennis McNevin, Kirsty Wright, Janet Chaseling, and Mark Barash [1] (hereafter MWCB). In their letter they acknowledge that Bright et al. [2] is a “valuable first step in establishing a foundational validity for mixture interpretation using probabilistic software, as recommended by the PCAST report” and suggest further experiments to “better address this issue”.
View less >
View more >We are writing in response to a recent letter appearing in Forensic Science International: Genetics entitled “Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) internal validation of STRmix™ – A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11–24″, authored by Dennis McNevin, Kirsty Wright, Janet Chaseling, and Mark Barash [1] (hereafter MWCB). In their letter they acknowledge that Bright et al. [2] is a “valuable first step in establishing a foundational validity for mixture interpretation using probabilistic software, as recommended by the PCAST report” and suggest further experiments to “better address this issue”.
View less >
Journal Title
Forensic Science International: Genetics
Volume
44
Subject
Mathematical Sciences
Biological Sciences
Law and Legal Studies
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Genetics & Heredity
Legal Medicine