Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPiquero, NL
dc.contributor.authorPiquero, AR
dc.contributor.authorStewart, ES
dc.contributor.editorBeaver, Kevin M
dc.contributor.editorBarnes, JC
dc.contributor.editorBoutwell, Brian B
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-19T03:37:09Z
dc.date.available2021-01-19T03:37:09Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.isbn9781452242255
dc.identifier.doi10.4135/9781483349114.n4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/401287
dc.description.abstractThe relationship between race and crime is on the one hand very strong, at least when considered from the vantage point of official crime statistics. There is a consistency in the data in that minorities—primarily African Americans—are overrepresented in both (serious) offending and correctional statistics. The reason(s) underlying this overrepresentation, however, are neither well documented nor fully understood. The lack of a consensus has led some commentators to view the disparity as a function of (a) differential involvement in serious offending by minorities that brings them to the attention of formal criminal justice authorities, (b) differential enforcement by criminal justice personnel (including discriminatory practices and decisions), or some combination of the two (see review in Piquero, 2008). On the other hand, and regar5dless of which explanation is most consistent with the data, the study of race and crime has been and continues to be both con­tentious and controversial (Kennedy, 1997; Sampson & Wilson, 1995; Walker, Spohn, & DeLone, 2011; Wilbanks, 1987). This chapter focuses on the main sociological explanations of the race-crime relationship. In so doing, it neither discounts the relevance of nonsociological viewpoints - because these are covered elsewhere in this book - nor does it review and policy proscriptions associated with the race-crime relationship - also discussed in the book. Instead, two prominent sociological perspectives are considered along with how they attempt to understand and explain race differences in offending. Accordingly, this chapter focuses on social structures, social areas, and social contingencies including: (a) disadvantaged neighborhood environments (which are also characterised by disadvantaged family, school and health systems, and differential employment structures) and (b) differential cultural adaptations in urban communities. A few prominent empirical examples are highlighted that assess key aspects of the theories reviewed. Finally, the chapter concludes with an identification of three important directions for future research centered on: (1) the reason(s) underlying the overrepresentation of minorities in criminal justice statistics, (2) the development and empirical research needed on recent theoretical frameworks, and (3) data collection and ensuring research on the ethnicity-crime relationship, especially concerning Hispanics/Latinos and immigrants.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.publisherSage Publications
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dc.relation.ispartofbooktitleThe Nurture Versus Biosocial Debate in Criminology: On the Origins of Criminal Behavior and Criminality
dc.relation.ispartofchapter3
dc.relation.ispartofchapternumbers26
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom43
dc.relation.ispartofpageto54
dc.subject.fieldofresearchLaw and legal studies
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode48
dc.titleSociological viewpoint on the race-crime relationship
dc.typeBook chapter
dc.type.descriptionB1 - Chapters
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPiquero, NL; Piquero, AR; Stewart, ES, Sociological viewpoint on the race-crime relationship, The Nurture Versus Biosocial Debate in Criminology: On the Origins of Criminal Behavior and Criminality, 2015, pp. 43-54
dc.date.updated2021-01-19T03:09:25Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorPiquero, Alex R.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Book chapters
    Contains book chapters authored by Griffith authors.

Show simple item record