• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Conference outputs
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Conference outputs
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Challenges to prospective consent in an interventional clinical trial in a paediatric intensive care unit

    Author(s)
    Doyle, Rebecca
    Williams, Tara
    Schibler, Andreas
    McBride, Craig
    Forster, Elizabeth
    Petsky, Helen
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Petsky, Helen
    McBride, Craig
    Doyle, Rebecca
    Forster, Elizabeth M.
    Year published
    2020
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Introduction: Studies in critically ill children within paediatric intensive care units (PICU) experience an ethical dilemma in that life-saving interventions may not allow time for prospective consent to be obtained from legal guardians. In certain circumstances there is insufficient time to consent before the intervention is performed. Objectives/Aims: This descriptive analysis aimed to identify the most common challenges to obtaining prospective consent in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) conducted within a tertiary PICU and examine how these challenges may affect recruitment of suitable study participants. Methods: ...
    View more >
    Introduction: Studies in critically ill children within paediatric intensive care units (PICU) experience an ethical dilemma in that life-saving interventions may not allow time for prospective consent to be obtained from legal guardians. In certain circumstances there is insufficient time to consent before the intervention is performed. Objectives/Aims: This descriptive analysis aimed to identify the most common challenges to obtaining prospective consent in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) conducted within a tertiary PICU and examine how these challenges may affect recruitment of suitable study participants. Methods: Data pertaining to consent was collected at the recruitment stage of a large RCT conducted within Queensland Children’s Hospital PICU. Data included whether recruitment was via prospective or deferred consent. In the deferred consent group, researchers specified whether the parent had a prior awareness of the study and recorded reason/s why if the parent was unaware. Results: At the 2-year mark, results indicated 16% (n=49) of participants were recruited using prospective consent, with the remainder (n=252) recruited using deferred consent. Eighty-nine parents in this group had no knowledge of the study prior to the intervention occurring. Sixteen (18%) parents were too distressed to approach, 61 (69%) parents were not at the bedside, and 19 (21%) patients experienced a rapid or unexpected deterioration. Eight had “other” or “unknown” reasons recorded by research staff. Conclusion: Commonly cited challenges to prospective consent included the emergent nature of the intervention, the absence of a legal guardian, and parental distress indicating a lack of capacity to provide informed consent. This information highlights the need to consider alternate methods of consent in clinical trials within PICU. Although it should be the preferred option, prospective consent is not always possible. Deferred consent was well accepted with an absence of parental complaints regarding the consent process.
    View less >
    Conference Title
    Australian Critical Care
    Volume
    33
    Issue
    Suppl 1
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2020.04.015
    Subject
    Clinical sciences
    Nursing
    Science & Technology
    Life Sciences & Biomedicine
    Critical Care Medicine
    General & Internal Medicine
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/401434
    Collection
    • Conference outputs

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander