A short note on the chisholm paradox
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Governatori, G
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2020
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
We advance an alternative version of the Chisholm Paradox and we argue that the alternative version (while logically equivalent to the original version), in its manifestation in the natural language, is not intuitively consistent. The alternative version of the paradox suggests some requirements for deontic logics designed for legal reasoning.We advance an alternative version of the Chisholm Paradox and we argue that the alternative version (while logically equivalent to the original version), in its manifestation in the natural language, is not intuitively consistent. The alternative version of the paradox suggests some requirements for deontic logics designed for legal reasoning.
View less >
View less >
Conference Title
CEUR Workshop Proceedings
Volume
2632
Publisher URI
Copyright Statement
© 2020 for this paper by its author. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Subject
Theory of computation
Information systems