Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJerofke-Owen, T
dc.contributor.authorGarnier-Villarreal, M
dc.contributor.authorFial, A
dc.contributor.authorTobiano, G
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-09T23:23:55Z
dc.date.available2021-02-09T23:23:55Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0309-2402
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jan.14402
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/401721
dc.description.abstractAim: To identify, critically appraise, and summarize instruments that measure patients’ preferences for engagement in health care. Design: Psychometric systematic literature review. Data sources: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to March 2019. Review methods: Three reviewers independently evaluated the ‘methodological quality’ and the ‘measurement properties’ of the included instruments using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist and Terwee's quality criteria. Each instrument was given a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) score. The review was registered at PROSPERO (registry number CRD42018109253). Results: A total of 16 studies evaluating 8 instruments measuring patients’ preferences for engagement in health care were included. All instruments were downgraded for their ‘methodological quality’ or ‘measurement properties’, or a combination of both. Common concerns were lack of theoretical basis, absence of patient input during development, incorrect usage and reporting of validity measures and absence of a priori hypotheses to test validity. Conclusions: There were no identified instruments that demonstrated adequate evidence for all measurement properties. The Patient Preferences for Patient Participation Scale (4Ps) and 10-item Decisional Engagement Scale (DES-10) had the highest overall GRADE scores; however, each had some underlying developmental or methodological issues. Impact: Assessing how patients prefer to engage in their care is a critical first step to truly individualize engagement interventions to meet patient expectations. Systematic reviews of measures of patient experience with engagement in health care have been undertaken but none are available on measures of patient preferences for engagement. The results highlight the need to further develop and test instruments that measure patients’ preferences for engagement in health care within a framework for consumerism. Involving the consumer in the instrument development process will ensure that engagement strategies used by healthcare providers are relevant and individualized to consumer preferences.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Advanced Nursing
dc.subject.fieldofresearchNursing
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4205
dc.subject.keywordsadult population
dc.subject.keywordsinstruments
dc.subject.keywordsliterature review
dc.subject.keywordspatient participation
dc.titleSystematic review of psychometric properties of instruments measuring patient preferences for engagement in health care
dc.title.alternative有关测量患者参与医疗保健偏好的工具的心理测量特性的系统评估
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJerofke-Owen, T; Garnier-Villarreal, M; Fial, A; Tobiano, G, Systematic review of psychometric properties of instruments measuring patient preferences for engagement in health care, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2020
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-04-20
dc.date.updated2021-02-05T01:08:22Z
dc.description.versionAccepted Manuscript (AM)
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered as an advanced online version in Griffith Research Online.
gro.rights.copyright© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Systematic review of psychometric properties of instruments measuring patient preferences for engagement in health care, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2020, 76 (8), pp. 1988-2004, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14402. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving (http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-828039.html)
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorTobiano, Georgia A.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record