Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFoster, Tim
dc.contributor.authorFalletta, Jay
dc.contributor.authorAmin, Nuhu
dc.contributor.authorRahman, Mahbubur
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Pengbo
dc.contributor.authorRaj, Suraja
dc.contributor.authorMills, Freya
dc.contributor.authorPetterson, Susan
dc.contributor.authorNorman, Guy
dc.contributor.authorMoe, Christine
dc.contributor.authorWilletts, Juliet
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-22T04:46:42Z
dc.date.available2021-02-22T04:46:42Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1438-4639
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113669
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/402458
dc.description.abstractFaecal-oral infections are a major component of the disease burden in low-income contexts, with inadequate sanitation seen as a contributing factor. However, demonstrating health effects of sanitation interventions - particularly in urban areas - has proved challenging and there is limited empirical evidence to support sanitation decisions that maximise health gains. This study aimed to develop, apply and validate a systems modelling approach to inform sanitation infrastructure and service decision-making in urban environments by examining enteric pathogen inputs, transport and reduction by various sanitation systems, and estimating corresponding exposure and public health impacts. The health effects of eight sanitation options were assessed in a low-income area in Dhaka, Bangladesh, with a focus on five target pathogens (Shigella, Vibrio cholerae, Salmonella Typhi, norovirus GII and Giardia). Relative to the sanitation base case in the study site (24% septic tanks, 5% holding tanks and 71% toilets discharging directly to open drains), comprehensive coverage of septic tanks was estimated to reduce the disease burden in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) by 48-72%, while complete coverage of communal scale anaerobic baffled reactors was estimated to reduce DALYs by 67-81%. Despite these improvements, a concerning health risk persists with these systems as a result of effluent discharge to open drains, particularly when the systems are poorly managed. Other sanitation options, including use of constructed wetlands and small bore sewerage, demonstrated further reductions in local health risk, though several still exported pathogens into neighbouring areas, simply transferring risk to downstream communities. The study revealed sensitivity to and a requirement for further evidence on log reduction values for different sanitation systems under varying performance conditions, pathogen flows under flooding conditions as well as pathogen shedding and human exposure in typical low-income urban settings. Notwithstanding variability and uncertainties in input parameters, systems modelling can be a feasible and customisable approach to consider the relative health impact of different sanitation options across various contexts, and stands as a valuable tool to guide urban sanitation decision-making.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom113669
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInternational Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
dc.relation.ispartofvolume233
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPublic Health and Health Services
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1117
dc.subject.keywordsBangladesh
dc.subject.keywordsFaecal pathogens
dc.subject.keywordsOn-site sanitation
dc.subject.keywordsSeptic tanks
dc.subject.keywordsSustainable development goal 6
dc.titleModelling faecal pathogen flows and health risks in urban Bangladesh: Implications for sanitation decision making
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFoster, T; Falletta, J; Amin, N; Rahman, M; Liu, P; Raj, S; Mills, F; Petterson, S; Norman, G; Moe, C; Willetts, J, Modelling faecal pathogen flows and health risks in urban Bangladesh: Implications for sanitation decision making, International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 2021, 233, pp. 113669
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-11-24
dcterms.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.date.updated2021-02-22T03:22:18Z
dc.description.versionVersion of Record (VoR)
gro.rights.copyright© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier GmbH. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorPetterson, Susan


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record