Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKoehler, Tine
dc.contributor.authorCassell, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorKoehler, Tine
dc.contributor.authorLangley, Ann
dc.contributor.authorRumyantseva, Maria
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Anne D
dc.contributor.authorWelch, Catherine Lynelle
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-25T00:14:40Z
dc.date.available2021-02-25T00:14:40Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0065-0668en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5465/ambpp.2020.18615symposiumen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/402579
dc.description.abstractWith the increased debate on replication in quantitative research, the question arises as to whether there should be more replication occurring in qualitative research as well, and what that might mean. However, qualitative research is not sensitive to the same research methods challenges as quantitative research. Current debate about the role and forms of replication desirable in qualitative research in management has shifted from an emphasis on what qualitative replication is to the discussion of what qualitative replication should not be. The central argument in this debate is that the diversity of epistemological approaches in management research makes it impossible to achieve a ‘gold standard’ that fits all. At the same time, outside of the management discipline (e.g., history, sociology, anthropology, law), there are alternative ways in which qualitative research has been used for replication that might be more valuable than attempts to synchronize qualitative and quantitative replication methods. The purpose of this panel symposium is, therefore, to discuss alternative views on what qualitative replication could be and its possible value for qualitative research.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherAcademy of Managementen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom18615en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto18615en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAcademy of Management Proceedingsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume2020en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchSociologyen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBusiness and Managementen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1608en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1503en_US
dc.titlePerspectives on Replication in Qualitative Researchen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articlesen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKoehler, T; Cassell, C; Koehler, T; Langley, A; Rumyantseva, M; Smith, AD; Welch, CL, Perspectives on Replication in Qualitative Research, Academy of Management Proceedings, 2020, 2020 (1), pp. 18615-18615en_US
dc.date.updated2021-02-24T23:26:35Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorCassell, Catherine


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record