Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorC. Elliott, Bruceen_US
dc.contributor.authorG. Lloyd, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorJ.C. Lee, Marcusen_US
dc.contributor.authorL. Reid, Siobhanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-04T22:38:53Z
dc.date.available2017-04-04T22:38:53Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.date.modified2011-08-24T07:14:12Z
dc.identifier.issn01959131en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a55200en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/40262
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Hamstrings injury/reinjury is common, but functional reasons for this remain unclear. This study identified bilateral differences in swing phase running biomechanics and isokinetic strength, between the previously hamstring-injured and uninjured limbs of male athletes involved in sprint-based sports. Methods: Athletes, injury-free during testing, underwent three-dimensional motion analyses to determine bilateral joint kinematics and kinetics during submaximal sprinting. Various hip and knee isokinetic strength tests were performed bilaterally using a Biodex dynamometer. Peak torque (PT) and total work (TW; normalized to body mass) were collected isokinetically from concentric hamstrings (CH), concentric quadriceps (CQ), concentric hip flexors (CHF), and eccentric hamstrings (EH). Three PT and TW ratios were created, namely, CH/CQ, EH/CQ, and EH/CHF, and were compared between the previously injured and uninjured limbs. Results: Lower limb swing phase kinematics and kinetics were similar. Only peak hip flexion angle in late swing was significantly reduced (1.9੠in the previously injured limb. EH PT was decreased (26.2 N筷kg-1) and occurred at shorter hamstring lengths on the previously injured side, whereas CQ TW was increased by 13.6 J竧-1. EH/CQ and EH/CHF ratios for PT and TW were reduced on the previously injured limbs. Conclusions: Although swing phase biomechanics of submaximal sprinting were similar between limbs, the previously injured hamstrings did display significant weakness eccentrically. Residual eccentric weakness may predispose this muscle group to reinjury during late swing, compared with the uninjured limb, because the functional eccentric demand on both limbs was similar. Furthermore, the EH/CHF ratios may better reflect muscle function during sprinting, having the potential to influence rehabilitation to prevent reinjury.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom1942en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto1951en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue10en_AU
dc.relation.ispartofjournalMedicine and Science in Sports and Exerciseen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume41en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchSports Medicineen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBiomechanicsen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode110604en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode110601en_US
dc.titleRunning Biomechanics and Lower Limb Strength Associated with Prior Hamstring Injuryen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.date.issued2009
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record