Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPinkham, EP
dc.contributor.authorTeleni, L
dc.contributor.authorNixon, JL
dc.contributor.authorMcKinnel, E
dc.contributor.authorBrown, B
dc.contributor.authorJoseph, R
dc.contributor.authorWishart, LR
dc.contributor.authorMiller, E
dc.contributor.authorWard, EC
dc.contributor.authorHart, NH
dc.contributor.authorLock, G
dc.contributor.authorHanley, B
dc.contributor.authorChan, RJ
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-23T02:17:09Z
dc.date.available2021-03-23T02:17:09Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1743-7555
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ajco.13575
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/403363
dc.description.abstractAim: Cancer and its treatment produce significant acute and long-term adverse effects in cancer survivors, resulting in a range of supportive cancer care needs across the disease trajectory. To enhance supportive cancer care in Australia, this study sought to understand and describe conventional services offered nationwide, specific to their structure (ownership, setting, duration), process (participants, delivery mode, referral pathways), and outcomes (evaluation). Methods: A survey canvassing 13 conventional supportive cancer care interventions was electronically distributed to 265 cancer organizations in all Australian states and territories over 2019 and 2020. Cancer organizations were invited to participate if they provided at least one cancer-directed treatment (ie, surgery, radiation therapy, or systemic therapies); or clinical cancer care to adults, adolescents, or children; or conventional supportive care interventions to cancer survivors. Results: A response rate of 46% (n = 123/265) was achieved, with 72% of cancer organizations (n = 88) delivering at least one intervention. Most were provided as outpatient or inpatient services, with few at home (<13%) or via telehealth (<10%). Psychological therapy (90%), self-care (82%), exercise (77%), healthy eating (69%), and lymphedema (69%) services were most common. Fatigue management (51%) and pelvic health (32%) were less common. Services offering massage, return-to-work, cognitive therapy, sleep hygiene, and leisure were underrepresented (<31%). Conclusion: Provision of conventional supportive cancer care services continues to evolve in Australia. Multiple areas of care require development of dedicated services to address supportive cancer care intervention shortfalls across the country. Online resources and telemedicine are currently underutilized modalities that are available for further development.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAsia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPublic Health and Health Services
dc.subject.fieldofresearchOncology and Carcinogenesis
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1117
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1112
dc.titleConventional supportive cancer care services in Australia: A national service mapping study (The CIA study)
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPinkham, EP; Teleni, L; Nixon, JL; McKinnel, E; Brown, B; Joseph, R; Wishart, LR; Miller, E; Ward, EC; Hart, NH; Lock, G; Hanley, B; Chan, RJ, Conventional supportive cancer care services in Australia: A national service mapping study (The CIA study), Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2021
dc.date.updated2021-03-23T01:01:20Z
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered in Griffith Research Online as an advanced online version.
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorChan, Ray


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record