Cutting Through Legal Arguments: Constitutional Recognition
View/ Open
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Galloway, Kathrine
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2014
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
On 19 January 2012, the Prime Minister's Expert Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples ('the Panel') delivered its report on the constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians.1 From the convening of the Panel and since the report was delivered, there has been a lot of comment and public debate. Much of this has centred on the legal implications of constitutional change, although inevitably there has been political debate also. Sometimes it is difficult to tell the differenceOn 19 January 2012, the Prime Minister's Expert Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples ('the Panel') delivered its report on the constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians.1 From the convening of the Panel and since the report was delivered, there has been a lot of comment and public debate. Much of this has centred on the legal implications of constitutional change, although inevitably there has been political debate also. Sometimes it is difficult to tell the difference
View less >
View less >
Journal Title
Indigenous Law Bulletin
Volume
8
Issue
15
Copyright Statement
© 2014 Indigenous Law Centre and the author(s). The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this journal please refer to the journal’s website or contact the author(s).
Subject
Policy and administration