Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorXu, J
dc.contributor.authorCao, JY
dc.contributor.authorGraham, DJ
dc.contributor.authorLawson, RD
dc.contributor.authorSivakumar, BS
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-04T01:05:36Z
dc.date.available2021-06-04T01:05:36Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1558-9447en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/15589447211003179en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/404923
dc.description.abstractBackground: Reverse homodigital island flaps (RHIFs) are increasingly used to reconstruct traumatic fingertip injuries, but there is limited evidence on the efficacy of this technique. We performed a systematic review of the literature to establish the safety and functional outcomes of RHIF for traumatic fingertip injuries. Methods: Electronic searches were performed using 3 databases (PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL) from their date of inception to April 2020. Relevant studies were required to report on complications and functional outcomes for patients undergoing RHIF for primary fingertip reconstruction. Data were extracted from included studies and analyzed. Results: Sixteen studies were included, which produced a total cohort of 459 patients with 495 fingertip injuries. The index and middle fingers were involved most frequently (34.6% and 34.1%, respectively), followed by the ring finger (22%), the little finger (6.7%), and the thumb (2.6%). The mean postoperative static and moving 2-point discrimination was 7.2 and 6.7 mm, respectively. The mean time to return to work was 8.4 weeks. The mean survivorship was 98.4%, with the pooled complication rate being 28%. The pooled complication rate of complete flap necrosis was 3.6%, of partial flap necrosis was 10.3%, of venous congestion was 14.6%, of pain or hypersensitivity was 11.5%, of wound infection was 7.2%, of flexion contractures was 6.3%, and of cold intolerance was 17.7%. Conclusions: Reverse homodigital island flaps can be performed safely with excellent outcomes. To minimize complications, care is taken during dissection and insetting, with extensive rehabilitation adhered to postoperatively. Prospective studies assessing outcomes of RHIF compared with other reconstruction techniques would be beneficial.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalHanden_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1103en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode11en_US
dc.subject.keywordsdiagnosisen_US
dc.subject.keywordsfingeren_US
dc.subject.keywordsflapen_US
dc.subject.keywordsfracture/dislocationen_US
dc.subject.keywordshomodigitalen_US
dc.titleClinical Outcomes and Complications of Primary Fingertip Reconstruction Using a Reverse Homodigital Island Flap: A Systematic Reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articlesen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationXu, J; Cao, JY; Graham, DJ; Lawson, RD; Sivakumar, BS, Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Primary Fingertip Reconstruction Using a Reverse Homodigital Island Flap: A Systematic Review, Hand, 2021en_US
dc.date.updated2021-06-03T06:06:38Z
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered in Griffith Research Online as an advanced online version.en_US
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorGraham, David J.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record