Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Cherie J
dc.contributor.authorJames, Cassandra S
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Kaylene
dc.contributor.authorNicol, Jason M
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Rachael F
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Daryl L
dc.contributor.authorGehrig, Susan L
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, Gary J
dc.contributor.authorWassens, Skye
dc.contributor.authorDyer, Fiona
dc.contributor.authorSouthwell, Mark
dc.contributor.authorWatts, Robyn J
dc.contributor.authorBond, Nick R
dc.contributor.authorCapon, Samantha J
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T00:22:01Z
dc.date.available2021-06-08T00:22:01Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1323-1650
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/MF20338
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/404965
dc.description.abstractEvaluating wetland vegetation responses to flow regimes is challenging because of the inherently complex, variable and dynamic nature of wetland vegetation in space and time. We propose four principles to guide the development of management objectives and evaluation approaches to support adaptive management of wetland vegetation in flow-managed systems. First, we assert a need for more explicit, direct and defensible alignment of management objectives, targets and indicators to reflect broader ecological, sociocultural and economic values, and the underlying ecosystem functions that support them. Second, we propose a framework for indicator selection across multiple spatiotemporal scales and levels of ecological organisation, from individuals to landscape mosaics (vegscapes). Third, we emphasise the need to evaluate vegetation condition and responses to environmental flows in relation to a more nuanced understanding of temporal flow dynamics. Finally, we discuss the importance of considering the effects of non-flow variables that can modify vegetation responses to environmental flows. We highlight key knowledge needs required to support the implementation of these principles, particularly the urgency of improving our understanding of ecological, sociocultural and economic values of wetland vegetation and the attributes and functions that support these values.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofjournalMarine and Freshwater Research
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMarine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology)
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode060205
dc.subject.keywordsScience & Technology
dc.subject.keywordsLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject.keywordsPhysical Sciences
dc.subject.keywordsFisheries
dc.subject.keywordsLimnology
dc.titleBlue, green and in-between: objectives and approaches for evaluating wetland flow regimes based on vegetation outcomes
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCampbell, CJ; James, CS; Morris, K; Nicol, JM; Thomas, RF; Nielsen, DL; Gehrig, SL; Palmer, GJ; Wassens, S; Dyer, F; Southwell, M; Watts, RJ; Bond, NR; Capon, SJ, Blue, green and in-between: objectives and approaches for evaluating wetland flow regimes based on vegetation outcomes, Marine and Freshwater Research, 2021
dc.date.updated2021-06-08T00:09:08Z
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered in Griffith Research Online as an advanced online version.
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorBond, Nick R.
gro.griffith.authorCapon, Samantha J.
gro.griffith.authorPalmer, Gary


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record