Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSuetani, S
dc.contributor.authorChapman, J
dc.contributor.authorKorman, N
dc.contributor.authorChapman, C
dc.contributor.authorDark, F
dc.contributor.authorDodd, C
dc.contributor.authorParker, S
dc.contributor.authorSiskind, D
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-14T23:02:58Z
dc.date.available2021-06-14T23:02:58Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0004-8674en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/405125
dc.description.abstractBackground: People with psychotic disorders die more than 16 years younger than the general population, in part due to lack of exercise and sedentary behaviour. There has been limited testing of the acceptability and validity of physical activity measures among people with psychotic disorders. Objectives: This study aims to compare the acceptability of three distinct physical activity measurement tools in people with psychosis: an objective measurement tool, a self-report measure and an exercise capacity test. Methods: A total of 69 individuals with primary diagnoses of psychotic disorders were recruited. Each participant was given a GENEactiv wrist-worn accelerometer to wear day and night for the next 7 days. On day 8, another face-to-face assessment was conducted to administer the self-reported Simple Physical Activity Questionnaire and the six-minute walk test. We also asked participants to rate the ease or difficulty of completing these measures using a seven-point Likert-type scale. Findings: Sixty-six per cent (46/69) of participants completed all three assessment tools and 60.9% (42/69) completed the acceptability questionnaire. Most participants found it easy to complete all three measurement tools. The majority of the participants (52.8%) ranked the objective measurement tool as the easiest to use. Conclusions: All three measures were acceptable to people with psychosis, but objective measurement tools may be easier to use.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltden_US
dc.publisher.urihttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00048674211004750en_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameRANZCP 2021 Congressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2021-05-16
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2021-05-20
dc.relation.ispartoflocationTasmania, Australiaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom78en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto78en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue1_supplen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume55en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPsychology and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode11en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode17en_US
dc.subject.keywordsScience & Technologyen_US
dc.subject.keywordsLife Sciences & Biomedicineen_US
dc.subject.keywordsPsychiatryen_US
dc.titleA Comparison Study of Three Physical Activity Measurement Tools Examining Acceptability in People With Psychotic Disordersen_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE3 - Conferences (Extract Paper)en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSuetani, S; Chapman, J; Korman, N; Chapman, C; Dark, F; Dodd, C; Parker, S; Siskind, D, A Comparison Study of Three Physical Activity Measurement Tools Examining Acceptability in People With Psychotic Disorders, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 2021, 55 (1_suppl), pp. 78-78en_US
dc.date.updated2021-06-14T04:15:10Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorSuetani, Shuichi


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record