Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLyócsa, Š
dc.contributor.authorTodorova, N
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-30T05:06:18Z
dc.date.available2021-06-30T05:06:18Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0140-9883
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105367
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/405504
dc.description.abstractWe study how the day-ahead stock price volatility of 15 firms that are S&P 500 constituents in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production sub-industry is driven through six volatility factors represented by realized volatilities, namely, (i) firms’ own volatility, (ii) industry market volatility, (iii) local (U.S.) market volatility, (iv) world equity market volatility, (v) oil price volatility, and (vi) natural gas price volatility. Existing studies have reported results based on analysis of one or few volatility components, but given the high dependence among volatility factors, this might bias (overestimate) the true importance of each of the volatility factors on the price fluctuation of stocks in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production sub-industry. To take into account this inter-relatedness of volatility factors, we study all volatility factors together. Using augmented heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR) models and dynamic model averaging, our analysis shows that market volatility is most influential, followed by a stock's own volatility and industry level volatility. The role of the volatility of the oil market is of lesser importance, while the volatility of the world equity market does not appear to contain incremental information useful for predicting the volatility of firms in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production sub-industry. The role of the natural gas market is specific. An in-sample analysis suggests a negative relationship between firm-level volatility and volatility on the natural gas market. However, in an out-of-sample framework, the volatility of the natural gas market appears to be unrelated to firm-level volatility. Dynamic model averaging further suggests that the market and industry factors are time-varying. These findings have implications for financial risk management, as we show that in an out-of-sample framework, HAR models augmented with volatility factors outperform the plain HAR model by up to a 3.88% increase in volatility forecast accuracy.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom105367
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEnergy Economics
dc.relation.ispartofvolume100
dc.subject.fieldofresearchFinancial econometrics
dc.subject.fieldofresearchInvestment and risk management
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBanking, finance and investment
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode350203
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode350208
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode3502
dc.titleWhat drives volatility of the U.S. oil and gas firms?
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLyócsa, Š; Todorova, N, What drives volatility of the U.S. oil and gas firms?, Energy Economics, 2021, 100, pp. 105367
dc.date.updated2021-06-30T04:44:23Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorTodorova, Neda


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record