Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKnight, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorSatchell, Liam
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-07T00:40:31Z
dc.date.available2021-07-07T00:40:31Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0253292en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/405742
dc.description.abstractConsumer suspicion of conventional pet foods, along with perceived health benefits of alternative diets, are fuelling development of the latter. These include raw meat diets, in vitro meat products, and diets based on novel protein sources such as terrestrial and marine plants, insects, yeast and fungi. However, some claim vegan diets may be less palatable, or may compromise animal welfare. We surveyed 4,060 dog or cat guardians to determine the importance to them of pet food palatability, and the degree to which their animals displayed specific behavioural indicators of palatability at meal times. Guardians were asked to choose one dog or cat that had been within their household for at least one year, and not on a prescription or therapeutic diet. Of 3,976 respondents who played some role in pet diet decision-making, palatability was the third most important among 12 factors cited as important when choosing pet diets. For 1,585 respondents feeding conventional or raw meat diets, who stated they would realistically consider alternative diets, palatability was the fourth most important among 14 desired attributes. For the 2,308 dogs included, reported observations of 10 behavioural indicators of palatability at meal times reliably indicated significant effects of increased reports of appetitive behaviour by dogs on a raw meat diet, as opposed to a conventional diet. There was no consistent evidence of a difference between vegan diets and either the conventional or raw meat diets. For the 1,135 cats included, reported observations of 15 behavioural indicators indicated that diet made little difference to food-oriented behaviour. Based on these owner-reported behaviours, our results indicate that vegan pet foods are generally at least as palatable to dogs and cats as conventional meat or raw meat diets, and do not compromise their welfare, when other welfare determinants, such as nutritional requirements, are adequately provided.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrome0253292en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue6en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPLoS Oneen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume16en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMarketingen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchVeterinary Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1505en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode0707en_US
dc.titleVegan versus meat-based pet foods: Owner-reported palatability behaviours and implications for canine and feline welfareen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articlesen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKnight, A; Satchell, L, Vegan versus meat-based pet foods: Owner-reported palatability behaviours and implications for canine and feline welfare., PLoS One, 2021, 16 (6), pp. e0253292en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-06-01
dcterms.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.date.updated2021-07-05T23:55:29Z
dc.description.versionVersion of Record (VoR)en_US
gro.rights.copyright© 2021 Knight, Satchell. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_US
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorKnight, Andrew D.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record