Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarnane, Kerry
dc.contributor.authorGustafsson, Louise
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Sally
dc.contributor.authorRosbergen, Ingrid
dc.contributor.authorGrimley, Rohan
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-14T23:17:29Z
dc.date.available2021-07-14T23:17:29Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0963-8288
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09638288.2021.1918770
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/405949
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To explore the decision-making processes and experiences of acute and rehabilitation clinicians, regarding referral and acceptance of patients to rehabilitation after stroke. Materials and methods: Multi-site rapid ethnography, involving observation of multidisciplinary case conferences, interviews with acute stroke and rehabilitation clinicians, and review of key documents within five (5) acute stroke units (ASUs) in Queensland, Australia. A cyclical, inductive content analysis was performed. Results: Seven key themes were identified, revealing the complex nature of post-stroke rehabilitation referral and acceptance decision making. Although the majority of clinicians felt that all patients could benefit from rehabilitation, they acknowledged this could not always be the case. Rehabilitation potential and goals were considered by clinicians, but decision making was impacted by ASU context and team processes, rehabilitation service availability and access procedures, and the relationships between the acute and rehabilitation clinicians. Patients and families were not actively involved in the decision-making processes. Conclusions: Post-stroke rehabilitation decision making in Queensland, Australia involves complex processes and compromise. Decisions are not based solely on patients’ rehabilitation needs, and patients and families are not actively involved in the decision-making process. Mechanisms are required to streamline access procedures, and improve shared decision making with patients.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Referral decision making for post-stroke rehabilitation is complex and not always based solely on patients’ needs. Clear and straightforward access procedures and positive relationships between acute and rehabilitation clinicians have a positive impact on referral decision making. Stroke services should review their processes to ensure shared decision making is facilitated when patients require access to rehabilitation.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Group
dc.relation.ispartofjournalDisability and Rehabilitation
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBiomedical and clinical sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode32
dc.subject.keywordsScience & Technology
dc.subject.keywordsLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject.keywordsRehabilitation
dc.subject.keywordsStroke
dc.title“Everyone needs rehab, but…”: exploring post-stroke rehabilitation referral and acceptance decisions
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMarnane, K; Gustafsson, L; Bennett, S; Rosbergen, I; Grimley, R, “Everyone needs rehab, but…”: exploring post-stroke rehabilitation referral and acceptance decisions, Disability and Rehabilitation, 2021
dc.date.updated2021-07-14T23:12:56Z
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered as an advanced online version in Griffith Research Online.
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorGustafsson, Louise
gro.griffith.authorGrimley, Rohan
gro.griffith.authorMarnane, Kerry A.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record