Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorQueiroz, Nuno
dc.contributor.authorHumphries, Nicolas E
dc.contributor.authorCouto, Ana
dc.contributor.authorVedor, Marisa
dc.contributor.authorda Costa, Ivo
dc.contributor.authorSequeira, Ana MM
dc.contributor.authorMucientes, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.authorSantos, António M
dc.contributor.authorAbascal, Francisco J
dc.contributor.authorAbercrombie, Debra L
dc.contributor.authorAbrantes, Katya
dc.contributor.authorAcuña-Marrero, David
dc.contributor.authorAfonso, André S
dc.contributor.authorGustafson, Johan A
dc.contributor.authoret. al.
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-23T06:30:22Z
dc.date.available2021-07-23T06:30:22Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0028-0836
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41586-021-03464-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/406271
dc.description.abstractREPLYING TO A. V. Harry & J. M. Braccini Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03463-w (2021) Our global analysis1 estimated the overlap and fishing exposure risk (FEI) using the space use of satellite-tracked sharks and longline fishing effort monitored by the automatic identification system (AIS). In the accompanying Comment, Harry and Braccini2 draw attention to two localized shark–longline vessel overlap hotspots in Australian waters, stating that 47 fishing vessels were misclassified as longline and purse seine vessels in the Global Fishing Watch (GFW)3 2012–2016 AIS fishing effort data product that we used. This, they propose2, results in misidentifications that highlight fishing exposure hotspots that are subject to an unexpected level of sensitivity in the analysis and they suggest that misidentifications could broadly affect the calculations of fishing exposure and the central conclusions of our study1. We acknowledged in our previously published paper1 that gear reclassifications were likely to occur for a small percentage of the more than 70,000 vessels studied, however, here we demonstrate that even using much larger numbers of vessel reclassifications than those proposed by Harry and Braccini2, the central results and conclusions of our paper1 do not change.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.relation.ispartofpagefromE20
dc.relation.ispartofpagetoE28
dc.relation.ispartofissue7866
dc.relation.ispartofjournalNature
dc.relation.ispartofvolume595
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEcological Applications
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEnvironmental Science and Management
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode0501
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode0502
dc.titleReply to: Caution over the use of ecological big data for conservation.
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC3 - Articles (Letter/ Note)
dcterms.bibliographicCitationQueiroz, N; Humphries, NE; Couto, A; Vedor, M; da Costa, I; Sequeira, AMM; Mucientes, G; Santos, AM; Abascal, FJ; Abercrombie, DL; Abrantes, K; Acuña-Marrero, D; Afonso, AS; Afonso, P; Anders, D; Araujo, G; Arauz, R; Bach, P; Barnett, A; Bernal, D; Berumen, ML; Lion, SB; Bezerra, NPA; Blaison, AV; Block, BA; Bond, ME; Bonfil, R; Braun, CD; Brooks, EJ; Brooks, A; Brown, J; Byrne, ME; Campana, SE; Carlisle, AB; Chapman, DD; Chapple, TK; Chisholm, J; Clarke, CR; Clua, EG; Cochran, JEM; Crochelet, EC; Dagorn, L; Daly, R; Cortés, DD; Doyle, TK; Drew, M; Duffy, CAJ; Erikson, T; Espinoza, E; Ferreira, LC; Ferretti, F; Filmalter, JD; Fischer, GC; Fitzpatrick, R; Fontes, J; Forget, F; Fowler, M; Francis, MP; Gallagher, AJ; Gennari, E; Goldsworthy, SD; Gollock, MJ; Green, JR; Gustafson, JA; Guttridge, TL; Guzman, HM; Hammerschlag, N; Harman, L; Hazin, FHV; Heard, M; Hearn, AR; Holdsworth, JC; Holmes, BJ; Howey, LA; Hoyos, M; Hueter, RE; Hussey, NE; Huveneers, C; Irion, DT; Jacoby, DMP; Jewell, OJD; Johnson, R; Jordan, LKB; Joyce, W; Keating Daly, CA; Ketchum, JT; Klimley, AP; Kock, AA; Koen, P; Ladino, F; Lana, FO; Lea, JSE; Llewellyn, F; Lyon, WS; MacDonnell, A; Macena, BCL; Marshall, H; McAllister, JD; Meÿer, MA; Morris, JJ; Nelson, ER; Papastamatiou, YP; Peñaherrera-Palma, C; Pierce, SJ; Poisson, F; Quintero, LM; Richardson, AJ; Rogers, PJ; Rohner, CA; Rowat, DRL; Samoilys, M; Semmens, JM; Sheaves, M; Shillinger, G; Shivji, M; Singh, S; Skomal, GB; Smale, MJ; Snyders, LB; Soler, G; Soria, M; Stehfest, KM; Thorrold, SR; Tolotti, MT; Towner, A; Travassos, P; Tyminski, JP; Vandeperre, F; Vaudo, JJ; Watanabe, YY; Weber, SB; Wetherbee, BM; White, TD; Williams, S; Zárate, PM; Harcourt, R; Hays, GC; Meekan, MG; Thums, M; Irigoien, X; Eguiluz, VM; Duarte, CM; Sousa, LL; Simpson, SJ; Southall, EJ; Sims, DW, Reply to: Caution over the use of ecological big data for conservation., Nature, 2021, 595 (7866), pp. E20-E28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03464-9
dcterms.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.date.updated2021-07-20T22:36:16Z
gro.rights.copyright© 2021 Nature Publishing Group. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal website for access to the definitive, published version.
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorGustafson, Johan A.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record