Show simple item record

dc.contributor.convenorAustralian Psychological Societyen_AU
dc.contributor.authorPoropat, Arthuren_US
dc.contributor.editorNerina L. Jimmieson, Neal M. Ashkanasy and Lisa M. Bradleyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T10:06:57Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T10:06:57Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.modified2011-09-09T07:06:17Z
dc.identifier.refuriwww.iopconference.com.auen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/40748
dc.description.abstractConscientiousness has been demonstrated to reliably predict workplace performance, but previous research has relied almost exclusively on self-other correlational designs, which may inadvertently reduce observed correlations. However, these have been preferred because the main alternative, obtaining ratings of multiple measures from the same source, raises concerns about common-method variance and associated bias. To address these problems, a structural equation modeling analysis of meta-analytic, multitrait-multirater data was conducted to estimate construct-level correlations of conscientiousness with performance. Construct-level correlations were substantially greater than scalecorrected self-other correlations of conscientiousness with overall performance and citizenship performance. Despite substantial method variance, self-self correlations provided the most accurate estimates of construct-level correlations. Implications for understanding the relationship between conscientiousness and performance, especially citizenship performance, are discussed. Reviewers should reconsider what rating methods are appropriate for specific questions, and researchers should use a broader range of sources when estimating construct-level relationships.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherAustralian Psychological Societyen_US
dc.publisher.placeBrisbane, Australiaen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.iopconference.com.au/en_AU
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameIOP 2011 : 9th Industrial and Organisational Psychology Conferenceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleIOP 2011 : 9th Industrial and Organisational Psychology Conference: Connectivity in a dynamic world Human connection in a world of rapid change Conference Proceedingsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2011-06-23en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2011-06-26en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationBrisbane, Australiaen_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPsychological Methodology, Design and Analysisen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchIndustrial and Organisational Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPersonality, Abilities and Assessmenten_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode170110en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode170107en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode170109en_US
dc.titleWhat a Difference a Rater Makes: Rater-Method Variance and Conscientiousness-Work Performance Correlationsen_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE1 - Conference Publications (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Health, School of Applied Psychologyen_US
gro.date.issued2011
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record