dc.contributor.author | Baque, Emmah | |
dc.contributor.author | Barber, Lee | |
dc.contributor.author | Sakzewski, Leanne | |
dc.contributor.author | Boyd, Roslyn N | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-05T05:56:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-05T05:56:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0269-9052 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3109/02699052.2016.1165869 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/407600 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To determine test–re-test reproducibility of the Timed Up & Go (TUG) test, 30-second repetition maximum (repmax) of functional exercises, 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and High-level Mobility Assessment Tool (HiMAT) in children with Acquired Brain Injury (ABI). Secondarily, to assess the accuracy between hand-timed and video-timed scores for the TUG test and HiMAT. Methods: Thirty children at least 1 year post-ABI (mean age at assessment = 11 years 11 months, SD = 2 years 4 months; 14 males; Gross Motor Function Classification Scale I = 17, II = 13) were assessed twice. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement and minimum detectable change (MDC) were determined. The Bland-Altman method and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) were used to assess the agreement between hand and video-timed TUG test and HiMAT scores. Results: Test–re-test reproducibility was acceptable for the TUG test (ICC = 0.92; MDC = 1.2s); repmax of functional exercises (ICC = 0.84–0.98; MDC = 4–8 reps); 6MWT (ICC = 0.90; MDC = 69.38 m) and HiMAT (ICC = 0.98; MDC = 6). Comparison of hand and video scores for the TUG test and HiMAT demonstrated a mean difference of 0.23 (LOA = –0.3–0.7) and –0.07 (LOA = –1.99–1.85), respectively. Conclusions Test–re-test reproducibility of lower limb activity capacity measures in children with ABI are acceptable. The MDC scores provide a useful reference to interpret treatment effectiveness. Video timing was more accurate than hand-timing for the TUG test. | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Yes | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | |
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom | 1143 | |
dc.relation.ispartofpageto | 1149 | |
dc.relation.ispartofissue | 9 | |
dc.relation.ispartofjournal | Brain Injury | |
dc.relation.ispartofvolume | 30 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Biomedical and clinical sciences | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Psychology | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Clinical sciences | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Allied health and rehabilitation science | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Clinical and health psychology | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 32 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 52 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 3202 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 4201 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 5203 | |
dc.subject.keywords | Science & Technology | |
dc.subject.keywords | Life Sciences & Biomedicine | |
dc.subject.keywords | Neurosciences | |
dc.subject.keywords | Rehabilitation | |
dc.subject.keywords | Neurosciences & Neurology | |
dc.title | Test-re-test reproducibility of activity capacity measures for children with an acquired brain injury | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dc.type.description | C1 - Articles | |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Baque, E; Barber, L; Sakzewski, L; Boyd, RN, Test-re-test reproducibility of activity capacity measures for children with an acquired brain injury, Brain Injury, 2016, 30 (9), pp. 1143-1149 | |
dc.date.updated | 2021-09-05T05:55:28Z | |
gro.hasfulltext | No Full Text | |
gro.griffith.author | Baque, Emmah | |
gro.griffith.author | Barber, Lee A. | |