Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKwasnicka, Dominika
dc.contributor.authorten Hoor, Gill A
dc.contributor.authorHekler, Eric
dc.contributor.authorHagger, Martin S
dc.contributor.authorKok, Gerjo
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-07T23:58:04Z
dc.date.available2021-09-07T23:58:04Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0887-0446
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/08870446.2021.1945061
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/407739
dc.description.abstractCurrent research funding models for health psychologists tend to be biased toward support for large-scale ‘definitive’ behavioural trials. This approach emphasizes rigorous tests of one or more key questions, but, unintentionally, may lead to the funding of interventions that are based on myriad untested assumptions. We propose that future funding models should provide support for ‘iterative’ research that tests assumptions at each stage of the intervention development process, including design, deployment, efficacy, implementation, and sustainability. More funding should be allocated to these developmental stages with funding allocated to testing the efficacy of definitive trials only when it is appropriately supported by research that indicates that key assumptions have been met. This shift should foster more robust behavioural interventions that have appropriate efficacy and effectiveness, and ‘work’ in the ‘real world’ contexts. Funders should support assumption testing using a diversity of methods (e.g., qualitative, quantitative, expert consensus), and encourage behavioural researchers to adjust their assumptions according the data produced. We contend that time is now to shift funding models to support assumption-testing research and ensure that funding applications for research testing ‘definitive’ behavioural trials has clear evidence supporting underlying assumptions.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Inc
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom787
dc.relation.ispartofpageto791
dc.relation.ispartofissue7
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPsychology & Health
dc.relation.ispartofvolume36
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCurriculum and pedagogy
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPsychology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode3901
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode52
dc.subject.keywordsScience & Technology
dc.subject.keywordsSocial Sciences
dc.subject.keywordsLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject.keywordsPublic, Environmental & Occupational Health
dc.subject.keywordsPsychology, Multidisciplinary
dc.titleProposing a new approach to funding behavioural interventions using iterative methods
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKwasnicka, D; ten Hoor, GA; Hekler, E; Hagger, MS; Kok, G, Proposing a new approach to funding behavioural interventions using iterative methods, Psychology & Health, 2021, 36 (7), pp. 787-791
dc.date.updated2021-09-07T23:57:03Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorHagger, Martin S.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record