Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChapman, Justin J
dc.contributor.authorCoombes, Jeff S
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Wendy J
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Asaduzzaman
dc.contributor.authorChamoli, Suneel
dc.contributor.authorPachana, Nancy A
dc.contributor.authorBurton, Nicola W
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-22T04:23:42Z
dc.date.available2021-09-22T04:23:42Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1755-2966
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.mhpa.2017.09.007
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/408202
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Adults with mental illness have increased risk of cardiovascular disease. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is more efficacious than moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) for improving cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF); however, the utility of HIIT for this group is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the feasibility and acceptability of HIIT and MICT in adults with mental illness. A secondary aim was to compare the efficacy of HIIT and MICT on mental health and fitness. Method: Inactive adults with self-reported mental illness participated in aerobic exercise three times/week over 12 weeks. Participants were randomised to HIIT (3x4-min bouts at 85–95% peak heart rate [HRpeak] interspersed with 3-min recovery bouts) or MICT (1 × 30-min at 65–75% HRpeak). Feasibility was assessed using attendance and withdrawal rates. Acceptability and mental health was assessed using self-administered questionnaires. Fitness was measured using indirect calorimetry during a graded fitness test to exhaustion. Results: 24 participants consented and 16 participants began the intervention (HIIT, n = 8; MICT, n = 8). Completion rates (HIIT, n = 4; MICT, n = 5) and median attendances were similar (HIIT = 81%, MICT = 86%). Most participants were satisfied with their allocation (88% MICT; 100% HIIT), and found the exercise enjoyable (63% MICT; 100% HIIT). Equal numbers reported that they would like to continue the exercise (63%), and that they would feel confident doing so without supervision (75%). No significant differences were found between groups on mental health and fitness. Conclusion This preliminary evidence suggests that HIIT was as acceptable and feasible as MICT for adults with mental illness.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.publisher.placeNetherlands
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom40
dc.relation.ispartofpageto48
dc.relation.ispartofjournalMental Health and Physical Activity
dc.relation.ispartofvolume13
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchSports science and exercise
dc.subject.fieldofresearchSports science and exercise not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPsychology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode3202
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4207
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode420799
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode52
dc.subject.keywordsScience & Technology
dc.subject.keywordsLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject.keywordsPsychiatry
dc.subject.keywordsHIIT
dc.subject.keywordsAerobic exercise
dc.titleThe feasibility and acceptability of high-intensity interval training for adults with mental illness: A Pilot Study
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationChapman, JJ; Coombes, JS; Brown, WJ; Khan, A; Chamoli, S; Pachana, NA; Burton, NW, The feasibility and acceptability of high-intensity interval training for adults with mental illness: A Pilot Study, Mental Health and Physical Activity, 2017, 13, pp. 40-48
dc.date.updated2021-09-22T04:21:30Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorBurton, Nicola W.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record