Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWen, Larryen_US
dc.contributor.authorTuffley, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorRout, Terryen_US
dc.contributor.editorRory V. O'Connor, Terry Rout, Fergal McCaffery, Alec Dorlingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T11:22:48Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T11:22:48Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.modified2012-04-29T22:13:06Z
dc.identifier.refurihttp://www.spiceconference.com/index.phpen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-642-21233-8_1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/40823
dc.description.abstractSoftware processes described by natural languages are frequently ambiguous and it is usually difficult to compare the similarity and difference between one process defined in one standard and its counterpart defined in another standard. This paper proposes Composition Tree (CT) as a graphic language to model software process based on its purpose and expected outcomes. CT is a formal graphic notation originally designed for modeling component based software system. This paper demonstrates that CT can be a powerful notation to give a clear and unambiguous description of a software process as well. This paper also investigates an algorithm which can compare two CT-modeled processes and provide an intuitive view called a Comparison Composition Tree (CCT) to highlight the differences and similarities between the two processesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.format.extent509471 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.spiceconference.com/index.phpen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencename11th International Conference, SPICE 2011en_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleSoftware Process Improvement and Capability Determinationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2011-05-30en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2011-06-01en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationDublin, Irelanden_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchSoftware Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode080309en_US
dc.titleUsing Composition Trees to Model and Compare Software Processen_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE1 - Conference Publications (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Sciences, School of Information and Communication Technologyen_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright 2011 Springer Berlin Heidelberg. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.comen_US
gro.date.issued2011
gro.hasfulltextFull Text


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record