Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorParker, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorDarabian, Kaveh
dc.contributor.authorEmeleus, Mary
dc.contributor.authorScott, James G
dc.contributor.authorCutbush, Jimsie
dc.description.abstractDear Sir, The RANZCP Scholarly Project requirements involve submission of a proposal to the local Branch Training Committee for approval and the submission of a 3000- to 5000-word report to the College following project completion.1 In Queensland, two psychiatrists with relevant academic expertise complete the proposal assessment; this assessment aims to safeguard against trainees commencing projects that are unfeasible or unlikely to meet the requirements. Based on the outcome of the proposal assessment, feedback and support are provided to the trainee, who can modify the proposal with a view to ensuring success.en_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAustralasian Psychiatryen_US
dc.subject.keywordsScience & Technologyen_US
dc.subject.keywordsLife Sciences & Biomedicineen_US
dc.titleShould trainees work prospectively towards achieving a Scholarly Project exemption by publication? (Letter)en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationParker, S; Darabian, K; Emeleus, M; Scott, JG; Cutbush, J, Should trainees work prospectively towards achieving a Scholarly Project exemption by publication? (Letter), Australasian Psychiatry, 2019, 27 (3), pp. 313-314en_US
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorParker, Stephen D.

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record