Commentary on: Understanding Breast Implant Illness: Etiology is the Key

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Magnusson, Mark R
McGuire, Patricia
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2021
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

This paper is a review of breast implant illness (BII) from an etiological perspective.1 BII has been discussed under various pseudonyms in the scientific literature, lay media, halls of government, court rooms, and more recently on social media platforms and the internet in one form or another since 1964.2 It is a highly emotive topic that was reported initially as an abundance of case reports and small series followed by a rush of media attention and then an attempt at a more analytic approach with retrospective population-based studies and extensive reviews.3-5 Despite intense focus on a potential relationship, there remains a lack of sufficient evidence to prove an association between breast implants and systemic symptoms. The authors of this paper have reiterated at multiple stages throughout their manuscript that there is insufficient evidence to support an association between saline or silicone breast implants (SBI) and autoimmunity, toxicity, or BII.

Journal Title
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
This publication has been entered in Griffith Research Online as an advanced online version.
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Clinical sciences
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Magnusson, MR; McGuire, P, Commentary on: Understanding Breast Implant Illness: Etiology is the Key, Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Collections