• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Using a New Measurement to Evaluate Pain Relief Among Cancer Inpatients with Clinically Significant Pain Based on a Nursing Information System: A Three-Year Hospital-Based Study

    Author(s)
    Wang, Wei-Yun
    Chu, Chi-Ming
    Sung, Chun-Sung
    Ho, Shung-Tai
    Wu, Yi-Syuan
    Liang, Chun-Yu
    Wang, Kwua-Yun
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Chu, Cordia M.
    Year published
    2016
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Objective. Developing a new measurement index is the first step in evaluating pain relief outcomes. Although the percentage difference in pain intensity (%PID) is the most popular indicator, this indicator does not take into account the goal of pain relief. Therefore, the aims of this study were to develop a pain relief index (PRI) for outcome evaluation and to examine the index using demographic characteristics of cancer inpatients with clinically significant pain. Design. Retrospective cohort study. Setting. A national hospital. Subjects. All cancer inpatients. Methods. Pain intensity was assessed using a numerical rating ...
    View more >
    Objective. Developing a new measurement index is the first step in evaluating pain relief outcomes. Although the percentage difference in pain intensity (%PID) is the most popular indicator, this indicator does not take into account the goal of pain relief. Therefore, the aims of this study were to develop a pain relief index (PRI) for outcome evaluation and to examine the index using demographic characteristics of cancer inpatients with clinically significant pain. Design. Retrospective cohort study. Setting. A national hospital. Subjects. All cancer inpatients. Methods. Pain intensity was assessed using a numerical rating scale, a faces pain scale or the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Tool. Using a nursing information system, a pain score database containing data from 2011 through 2013 was analyzed. Results. Cancer patients representing 93,812 hospitalizations were considered in this study. We focused on cancer patients for whom the worst pain intensity (WPI) was≥4 points. PRI values of 262.02% to 272.55% were observed in the WPI≥7 and 4 ≤ WPI ≤ 6 groups. Significant (P < 0.05) effects on PRI values were observed among patients who were > 65 years old, those who were admitted to the medicine or gynecology and those who had a hospital stay > 30 days. Conclusion. This hospital-based study demonstrated that the PRI is an effective and valid measure for evaluating outcome data using an electronic nursing information system. We will further define the meaningful range of percentage difference in PRI from various perspectives.
    View less >
    Journal Title
    Pain Medicine
    Volume
    17
    Issue
    11
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnw026
    Subject
    Clinical sciences
    Pharmacology and pharmaceutical sciences
    Health services and systems
    Public health
    Science & Technology
    Life Sciences & Biomedicine
    Anesthesiology
    Medicine, General & Internal
    General & Internal Medicine
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/408881
    Collection
    • Journal articles

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander