Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNovak, PA
dc.contributor.authorBayliss, P
dc.contributor.authorCrook, DA
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, EA
dc.contributor.authorPusey, BJ
dc.contributor.authorDouglas, MM
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-18T01:30:22Z
dc.date.available2021-10-18T01:30:22Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0046-5070
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/fwb.12907
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/409162
dc.description.abstractThe upstream migration of juvenile amphidromous shrimps has been proposed as a source of marine or estuarine-derived nutrients into fresh water. Little is known about the size and ecological importance of any such subsidy as there have been few observational or empirical studies on the topic. We investigated the upstream migration of the amphidromous shrimp, Macrobrachium spinipes (Palaemonidae) in the Daly River, of tropical northern Australia, to determine migration phenology, estimate migration biomass and determine whether migrating shrimps transport marine-derived energy and nutrients upstream. Field observations over 2 years revealed that juvenile M. spinipes migrate upstream en masse during extended periods of declining discharge over a period of 4–6 weeks during the wet season (March–May). In addition, juvenile atyid shrimps from the genus Caridina were also observed migrating upstream during the same period. Fine-scale sampling using fyke nets over 2 years (2013 and 2014) consistently found discharge to be the strongest predictor of M. spinipes and Caridina spp. biomass, while moon illumination and cloud cover were also important predictors. An estimated 10–20 million shrimps migrated upstream during each wet season, transporting c. 100 kg of carbon and c. 28 kg of nitrogen per year. Muscle sulphur stable isotopes (δ34S) and exoskeleton strontium isotope ratios (87Sr/86Sr) were used to establish if marine carbon was transported upstream by the juvenile M. spinipes. Isotope data from migratory M. spinipes were compared to the non-migratory freshwater Macrobrachium bullatum. No evidence of a marine signature in body tissue or exoskeleton was found using either technique, suggesting very rapid turnover of body tissues This study provides key insights into the migration phenology of amphidromous shrimps and, importantly, suggests that migrating M. spinipes do not transport significant amounts of marine-derived energy and nutrients across the marine/freshwater ecotone.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom880
dc.relation.ispartofpageto893
dc.relation.ispartofissue5
dc.relation.ispartofjournalFreshwater Biology
dc.relation.ispartofvolume62
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEnvironmental sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBiological sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode41
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode31
dc.titleDo upstream migrating, juvenile amphidromous shrimps, provide a marine subsidy to river ecosystems?
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNovak, PA; Bayliss, P; Crook, DA; Garcia, EA; Pusey, BJ; Douglas, MM, Do upstream migrating, juvenile amphidromous shrimps, provide a marine subsidy to river ecosystems?, Freshwater Biology, 2017, 62 (5), pp. 880-893
dc.date.updated2021-10-18T01:29:25Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorPusey, Bradley J.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record