Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChan, Derwin KC
dc.contributor.authorLee, Alfred SY
dc.contributor.authorTang, Tracy CW
dc.contributor.authorGucciardi, Daniel F
dc.contributor.authorYung, Patrick SH
dc.contributor.authorHagger, Martin S
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-26T05:46:12Z
dc.date.available2021-10-26T05:46:12Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00876
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/409482
dc.description.abstractDoping attitude is an individual's subjective evaluation (e.g., good or bad, useful or useless) toward the use of prohibited performance-enhancing substances or methods in sports. Research on doping attitude has traditionally relied on self-report questionnaire methods to measure the construct (Ntoumanis et al., 2014; Chan et al., 2015). However, as doping in sport is illegal (World Anti-Doping Agency, 2015) and perceived as socially unacceptable, athletes who hold positive attitudes toward doping are less likely to reveal them to others. As a result explicit measures of doping attitude are susceptible to potential bias as athletes may respond in a socially desirable fashion (Petróczi and Aidman, 2009; Gucciardi et al., 2010). To counter such bias, implicit measures such as the implicit association test (IAT; Greenwald et al., 1998) have been developed to capture individuals' non-conscious attitudes toward doping (Brand et al., 2014a,b; Schindler et al., 2015). The current paper aims to introduce a paper-and-pen IAT which could potentially serve as alternative method to the traditional computer-IAT for measuring athletes' doping attitude.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherFrontiers Media
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom876
dc.relation.ispartofjournalFrontiers in Psychology
dc.relation.ispartofvolume8
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPsychology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCognitive and computational psychology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode52
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode5204
dc.subject.keywordsSocial Sciences
dc.subject.keywordsPsychology, Multidisciplinary
dc.subject.keywordsPsychology
dc.subject.keywordsimplicit association test
dc.subject.keywordspaper-and-pen IAT
dc.titlePaper vs. pixel: Can we use a pen-and-paper method to measure athletes' implicit doping attitude?
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationChan, DKC; Lee, ASY; Tang, TCW; Gucciardi, DF; Yung, PSH; Hagger, MS, Paper vs. pixel: Can we use a pen-and-paper method to measure athletes' implicit doping attitude?, Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, 8, pp. 876
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-05-12
dc.date.updated2021-10-26T05:44:08Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorHagger, Martin S.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record