Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRamsay, Niamh
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Tracey
dc.contributor.authorBadrick, Tony
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-28T04:16:09Z
dc.date.available2021-10-28T04:16:09Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1533-029X
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/POC.0000000000000110
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/409521
dc.description.abstractObjective The effective treatment of many chronic diseases in primary care relies on patients undergoing regular blood tests, but patient adherence with this process has been shown to be suboptimal. Point-of-care testing, whereby timely pathology results can be obtained on-site at the time of patient consultation, has the potential to improve patient outcomes in various ways, one of which is to ensure that blood tests are collected at the required times. However, to accommodate this potential, innovation and change may be required in how primary care operates. Methods Three primary care practices with differing clinic and population characteristics were assessed by recording of the patient workflow of patients with type 2 diabetes in each site. Staff and patients in each practice were then questioned about workflow and their views on the potential impact of point-of-care testing implementation. Results The workflows at the 3 practices were complex as they sought to encourage patient compliance with pathology testing. Of the staff questioned, 80% saw the implementation of point-of-care testing as a way of improving patient outcomes and reducing the complexity of the workflow in primary care, with the highest percentage of staff suggesting this from the lower socioeconomic areas and higher need populations. Conclusions Despite complex workflow routines, compliance with laboratory testing remained suboptimal. Although point-of-care testing was seen as a way to improve practice workflows and increase staff efficiency, there remain some barriers to implementation that could be reduced by better staff understanding of the technology.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom144
dc.relation.ispartofpageto151
dc.relation.ispartofissue4
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPoint of Care
dc.relation.ispartofvolume15
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchNursing
dc.subject.fieldofresearchHealth services and systems
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPublic health
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode3202
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4205
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4203
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4206
dc.subject.keywordsScience & Technology
dc.subject.keywordsLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject.keywordsMedical Laboratory Technology
dc.subject.keywordspathology request
dc.subject.keywordspractice efficiency
dc.titleInvestigating Patient Adherence With Pathology Testing in Primary Care and How Point of Care Testing Can Improve It
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRamsay, N; Johnson, T; Badrick, T, Investigating Patient Adherence With Pathology Testing in Primary Care and How Point of Care Testing Can Improve It, Point of Care, 2016, 15 (4), pp. 144-151
dc.date.updated2021-10-28T04:14:57Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorBadrick, Tony C.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record