Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWorsey, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorEspinosa, Hugo
dc.contributor.authorShepherd, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorThiel, David
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-04T01:57:21Z
dc.date.available2021-11-04T01:57:21Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1369-7072
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12283-021-00359-w
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/409778
dc.description.abstractRunning surfaces influence energy consumption and gait parameters including swing time and stance time. This paper compares running gait cycle time, swing time and stance time, recorded on an athletics track, soft sand, and hard sand. The training and evaluation of supervised machine learning models for running surface prediction were developed using an ankle-worn inertial sensor. Models were trained using statistical features extracted from six participants using gyroscope-based stride cycles. Six different model types were trained and the performance of each model was evaluated using precision, recall, F1-score, Matthews correlation coefficient, area under the precision–recall curve and accuracy. There was a significant statistical difference in swing time and stance time across the surfaces for all participants (p < 0.05). Athlete-independent models demonstrated acceptable ability to distinguish soft sand from the two harder surfaces (≥ 0.75 mean precision, ≥ 0.90 mean recall, ≥ 0.83 mean F1-score, ≥ 0.98 mean area under the precision–recall curve across all models), but they were poor at differentiating between athletics track and hard sand. The athlete-dependent models demonstrated strong ability to classify all the surfaces (weighted average precision, recall, F1-score, Matthews correlation coefficient, area under the precision–recall curve, and overall accuracy ≥ 96%). Support vector machine models were the best in both athlete-independent and athlete-dependent methodologies. Features extracted from an ankle-worn inertial sensor can be used to classify running surface with high performance, when models are trained using features pertinent to each athlete.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom22
dc.relation.ispartofjournalSports Engineering
dc.relation.ispartofvolume24
dc.subject.fieldofresearchElectronics, sensors and digital hardware
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMachine learning
dc.subject.fieldofresearchSports science and exercise
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4009
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4611
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4207
dc.titleAutomatic classification of running surfaces using an ankle-worn inertial sensor
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWorsey, M; Espinosa, H; Shepherd, J; Thiel, D, Automatic classification of running surfaces using an ankle-worn inertial sensor, Sports Engineering, 2021, 24, pp. 22
dc.date.updated2021-11-03T08:46:26Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorEspinosa, Hugo G.
gro.griffith.authorWorsey, Matthew T.
gro.griffith.authorShepherd, Jonathan
gro.griffith.authorThiel, David V.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record