• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Conference outputs
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Conference outputs
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • SaP Curriculum negotiation: Can democratic topic selection reduce engagement and inclusiveness?

    Author(s)
    Love, Christopher
    Crough, julie
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Love, Christopher A.
    Crough, Julie A.
    Year published
    2020
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In 2018, we introduced a Student as Partners (SaP) to a second-year biochemistry course, to empower students and enhance engagement. At the time we thought long and hard about the ethos of our partnership with students, considering what components are required to create a genuine partnership and what was the appropriate level of student participation? Our partnership was two-fold: to allow students to vote on a selection of topics for part of the course, and, to design and negotiate part of the assessment. This case study focuses on involving student in the curriculum through democratic voting for two of six topics in the ...
    View more >
    In 2018, we introduced a Student as Partners (SaP) to a second-year biochemistry course, to empower students and enhance engagement. At the time we thought long and hard about the ethos of our partnership with students, considering what components are required to create a genuine partnership and what was the appropriate level of student participation? Our partnership was two-fold: to allow students to vote on a selection of topics for part of the course, and, to design and negotiate part of the assessment. This case study focuses on involving student in the curriculum through democratic voting for two of six topics in the course. The goal was to enhance student engagement by allowing them to choose what they wanted to learn, and we assumed that a democratic vote was the fairest way to decide which of the six topics was taught. Students’ agreed that being able to choose topics increased their engagement and they felt empowered (80.5%, 87%, & 82.5% in 2018, 2019 & 2020, respectively), however, this was not necessarily the case for all students. Student reflections revealed that some were less engaged when their topics were not chosen, for example, “Since my topics were not chosen, I wasn’t as engaged or interested,” while others expressed sheer relief, “I’m glad the winner was not enzyme kinetics”. Other students suggested that an imbalance in the numbers of students enrolled in different degree programs influenced the topic selection, “I know a lot of participants in the class are doing biomedical science which swayed the choice in their favour”. Indeed, approximately half of the students in the course were enrolled in the Bachelor of Biomedical Science and one of the topics, protein therapies, has been the top choice each year. These finding have unearthed an inequality in our approach to topic selection that we didn’t anticipate, resulting in reduced engagement for some students and so, less inclusive. We are now exploring a blended online learning approach where every student can choose and learn their chosen topics.
    View less >
    Conference Title
    2020 Deakin National Students as partners Roundtable
    Publisher URI
    https://www.deakin.edu.au/students/studying/students-helping-students-hub/sap-roundtable
    Subject
    Higher education
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/410267
    Collection
    • Conference outputs

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander