• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Are all complainants of sexual assault vulnerable? Views of Australian criminal justice professionals on the evidence-sharing process

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Deck525714-Accepted.pdf (298.9Kb)
    File version
    Accepted Manuscript (AM)
    Author(s)
    Deck, Sarah L
    Powell, Martine B
    Goodman-Delahunty, Jane
    Westera, Nina
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Powell, Martine B.
    Year published
    2022
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Cases of historic child assault typically rely on the complainant's narrative due to lack of corroborating evidence. Although it is important that complainants give their best evidence, concern has been expressed that evidence-sharing procedures are suboptimal. This study explored criminal justice professionals’ perspectives on the utility of introducing reforms to the evidence-sharing process. We interviewed judges, prosecutors, defence counsel and witness assistance officers (N = 43) on the utility of regulating the questioning of complainants and of using video-recorded interviews as evidence-in-chief. Many professionals ...
    View more >
    Cases of historic child assault typically rely on the complainant's narrative due to lack of corroborating evidence. Although it is important that complainants give their best evidence, concern has been expressed that evidence-sharing procedures are suboptimal. This study explored criminal justice professionals’ perspectives on the utility of introducing reforms to the evidence-sharing process. We interviewed judges, prosecutors, defence counsel and witness assistance officers (N = 43) on the utility of regulating the questioning of complainants and of using video-recorded interviews as evidence-in-chief. Many professionals perceived that adult complainants of child assault were vulnerable and supported reforms to evidence-sharing. Primary objections to these reforms were the belief that all adult complainants should share evidence in the same way and the poor quality of investigative interviews. This study illuminates potential barriers to the implementation of reforms which would change how adult complainants of child assault give evidence.
    View less >
    Journal Title
    The International Journal of Evidence & Proof
    Volume
    26
    Issue
    1
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127211060556
    Copyright Statement
    Deck, SL; Powell, MB; Goodman-Delahunty, J; Westera, N, Are all complainants of sexual assault vulnerable? Views of Australian criminal justice professionals on the evidence-sharing process, The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2022, 26 (1), pp. 20-33. Copyright 2021 The Authors. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications.
    Subject
    Applied and developmental psychology
    Forensic psychology
    Other law and legal studies
    Criminology
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/410758
    Collection
    • Journal articles

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E
    • TEQSA: PRV12076

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander