Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAllan, JI
dc.contributor.authorAuld, G
dc.contributor.authorCadman, T
dc.contributor.authorStevenson, H
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-10T07:40:26Z
dc.date.available2022-01-10T07:40:26Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1758-5880en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1758-5899.13036en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/411343
dc.description.abstractConservation biologists and environmental economists popularized ecosystem services as a governance concept in the 1990s. The concept, it was hoped, would valorize biodiversity conservation to place it on a level playing field with the economic concerns of the world's finance ministers and private sector. Has this valorization promise been realized within the international community? We examine this question by interrogating a constructed dataset of 272 international activities undertaken by international actors (e.g. non-governmental organizations, inter-governmental organizations, and other international organizations) that invoke or use the ecosystem services concept. We find that ecosystem service practice is dominated by capacity-building not the valuation of nature. This suggests that the international community is not extensively using the concept to value nature in order to inform governance decisions. We posit that budget and management pressures facing international organizations along with priorities of countries help explain the dominance of capacity-building. But we also suggest that a deeper understanding of the concept of ecosystem services – particularly its implied programme of action – is necessary to account for its unfulfilled promise to date. We close with implications from this study for broader work on global environmental governance.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalGlobal Policyen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPolicy and administrationen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPolitical scienceen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4407en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4408en_US
dc.titleComparative Fortunes of Ecosystem Services as an International Governance Concepten_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articlesen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAllan, JI; Auld, G; Cadman, T; Stevenson, H, Comparative Fortunes of Ecosystem Services as an International Governance Concept, Global Policy, 2021en_US
dc.date.updated2022-01-10T06:52:53Z
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered as an advanced online version in Griffith Research Online.en_US
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorCadman, Timothy M.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record